Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 02:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're agreed about how this tool should operate but I'd still like to
review how some of these items are classed as transformations. I dont
think that makes sense to the user.
Well, we can't really decide that without doing
On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 08:36:09PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 13:07 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
So another idea is to persuade Shawn to move everything gimp.org to
another server (perhaps somewhere in gnome.org/RedHat's colo to take
advantage of their sysadmin
While moves might not be considered to be within the category of
Transformations, they are commonly associated with them. A google of
CAD translations and transformations will readily display how the two
operations are commonly paired. Perhaps a better question to ask would
be what graphics
Hi,
Manish Singh a écrit :
I think policing it at all is silly.
That's unacceptable. And it's not your decision to make.
One really should evaluate emails on the actual *content*, and
not what the From address says. There are several active contributors
who do not use gimp.org addresses,
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:50:24 +0200, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 21:25 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:03:30 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do we handle the statusbar being invisible? Perhaps the statusbar
should
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 02:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're agreed about how this tool should operate but I'd still like to
review how some of these items are classed as transformations. I dont
think that makes sense to the user. I covered that in a reply to Sven.
Aha... so which of
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:48:29 +0200, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 02:13 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We're agreed about how this tool should operate but I'd still like to
review how some of these items are classed as transformations. I don't
think that
On 9/28/06, saulgoode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding the current user interface (in CVS), I fail to see any logicin having the selection tools possessing the ability to move selectioncontents, it is much simpler and more intuitive if they limit themselves
to selecting regions and not engage
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:42:12 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
1/ In general I find it needs too many mouse/keyboard actions to achieve a
simple operation.
1a/ specific: undo : edit | undo . This must be one of the most common
actions I want a one click solution, in the same window
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:11 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:48:29 +0200, Michael Natterer
Aha... so which of the tools under Transform Tool is not doing
a transform? I don't see any that wouldn't perfectly fit into
the category.
ciao,
--mitch
Mitch,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 21:48 +0930, David Gowers wrote:
On 9/28/06, saulgoode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Regarding the current user interface (in CVS), I fail to see
any logic
in having the selection tools possessing the ability to move
selection
On 9/28/06, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 21:48 +0930, David Gowers wrote: On 9/28/06, saulgoode [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Regarding the current user interface (in CVS), I fail to see
any logic in having the selection tools possessing the ability to move selection
Raphaël Quinet wrote:
I am not sure about does not operate vs. cannot manipulate, but I
I prefer operate to manipulate. An alternatives would be can not work
with indexed images or can not use indexed images
--
Cheers!
Kevin.
http://www.interlog.com/~kcozens/ |What are we going to do
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:39 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
2d/ I set a value , eg rotation degrees or scale percent. Next time I pull
up the dlg it's back to NOP settings : zero degrees or 100% scaling. Now I
dont necessarily want the same value but one thing it's sure I dont need
Hi Yosh,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 01:50 -0700, Manish Singh wrote:
One really should evaluate emails on the actual *content*, and
not what the From address says. There are several active contributors
who do not use gimp.org addresses, assuming their comments should have
less weight is rather
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 13:30 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
These informational messages would be displayed in the status bar without
the warning icon that is currently used (we could use some info icon
although using no icon is probably better if we want the warnings to be
noticed easily).
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:31:56PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
I am not really willing to ignore this issue any longer. I have had
several reports from people who received mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that
can be described as very irritating, to say the least. I think that we
can not any
On 9/28/06, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Current CVS, you have to press alt+shift or alt+control to actually
move the pixels with a selection tool. Nobody does that accidentially,
and it's a powerful tool for power users. I see no reason to remove it.
A feature being
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:39:39 +0200, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:42:12 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
1/ In general I find it needs too many mouse/keyboard actions to
achieve a
simple operation.
1a/ specific: undo : edit | undo . This must be one of
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:12:57 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 14:39 +0200, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
2d/ I set a value , eg rotation degrees or scale percent. Next time I
pull
up the dlg it's back to NOP settings : zero degrees or 100% scaling.
Now I
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 22:50 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think technical difficulties of implementation need to be separated from
UI discussion until the value of the idea has been assessed. I would have
other comments about the flexibility on API implementations.
I don't think this
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 23:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes there are inconsistencies already here. Rotate and shear behave
differently and bucket-fill does not revert to black and white every time
you use it.
Your accusations are unfair. First of all, your GIMP setup seems
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:21:15 +0200, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 23:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes there are inconsistencies already here. Rotate and shear behave
differently and bucket-fill does not revert to black and white every
time
you use
On 9/28/06, Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't get where the expectation that postings from gimp.org addressesshould be considered as anything but the individual _expression_ of theauthor. Expecting a volunteer organization to have a rigid public face
is ridiculous.When I initially
24 matches
Mail list logo
