On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:04:59 +0100, David Marrs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As an experiment at work I decided to work on just the one image when saving
for web and found that I really don't need to do the spot comparisons
between
images after all. What's more important is the ability to
David,
first of all thanks for taking the time to give us input.
There is one phrase here that I am not sure how to interpret:
I'm not entirely sure how I'd go about designing a website in gimp
to deal with this problem
The designing a website in gimp sounds scary to me because I then
Raphaël wrote:
let's see how short I can keep this.
We also have to be humble and remember that writing down the current
vision only took us a couple of hours, not 5 years (basically one hour
of discussion at LGM plus some e-mail exchanges while we were
polishing the minutes).
Two hours.
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 13:29 +0200, peter sikking wrote:
Two hours. The vision has been simmering in the back of the minds of
everybody involved for all the years that they have been working on
GIMP.
If you are now interpreting this vision that way that GIMP is not meant
to be used for
Akkana wrote:
I'm seeing an unspoken assumption in this thread that most photos
are edited in multiple sessions: read into gimp, do a few
operations, write to disk, read back in (perhaps hours or days
later), do a few more operations, write back out, repeat.
I was more thinking from the
Let me also try to keep this (relatively) short. I'm not good at this. :-)
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:29:49 +0200, peter sikking [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I take the vision as broad as it can be explained (it was phrased not so
specific for a reason), but not broader.
That's certainly fine. But
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:31:16 +0200, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let me also try to keep this (relatively) short. I'm not good at this. :-)
I could have made it much shorter. Summary:
1) Our vision focuses on a minority of GIMP users (experienced users, or
those who need
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:21:33 +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. If you want to specify something other than a user-specified
default for an acceptable level of quality while editing in the GIMP
(for example, overriding it with an image-specific value), that is
when you should use Save As.
Sorry - I always forget to Reply-All to this list...
On 7/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
GIMP IS A TOOL, NOT A TUTORIAL.
Take an analogy:
A builder needs to nail a piece of wood as a guide but all the nails he
has to hand are too big. To get round the problem he
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:29:01 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If there is an image specific value you do not need a default.
overriding a default with an image-specified value is a contradiction.
This reminds me about something that should be clarified... For all
these parameters that affect
10 matches
Mail list logo
