Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp license
On Friday 09 January 2009, Martin Nordholts wrote: Michael Natterer wrote: On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 15:36 +0800, C Wang wrote: So finally, I hereby suggest to move to GPL3 asap. Comments from any developers appreciated. Hi I agree, it's about time we move to GPLv3 now. I am all for it as well! js -- - Martin ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp license
So finally, I hereby suggest to move to GPL3 asap. Comments from any developers appreciated. I think I only have half a dozen lines of code in there, but in case there's any doubt, it's fine here :) My own code is generally dual licensed, with LGPL or LGPL on the one hand and with the Barefoot Licence on the other (very broadly like the MIT license but you have to go without shoes for a day within a week of first using the software) :-) Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/ Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/ Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp license
At 09.01.2009 20:49, Michael Natterer wrote: [...] So finally, I hereby suggest to move to GPL3 asap. Comments from any developers appreciated. Fine with me and thanks for asking. Hans Hans at Breuer dot Org --- Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to get along without it.-- Dilbert ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
