Hi Nicolas,
This is my first forum of any kind so please forgive me for any mistake.
i m a student and interested in gsoc project:Fast Adaptive Resampler Tailored
For Transformations Which Mostly Downsample
I have read the requirements properly for this project which also includes
jacobian
peter sikking wrote:
that is why we will have _one_ setting in the View menu, that
sets the overall strategy to either one-window or multi-window.
all further behaviour follows from that.
There could be more settings in the preferences though.
Couldn't there?
looking forward to that
hOSHI wrote:
peter sikking wrote:
that is why we will have _one_ setting in the View menu, that
sets the overall strategy to either one-window or multi-window.
all further behaviour follows from that.
There could be more settings in the preferences though.
Couldn't there?
it is good
peter sikking wrote:
it is good design practice to avoid that like the plague.
It's a good practice to avoid user comfort through customization?
Did i get that right?
--
View this message in context:
Von: hOSHI mutenho...@gmail.com
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Customization is overrated.
Then why can i define my own window and statusbar format in gimp?
;]
There have been comments that there's too much information shown there, and
most of it isn't needed, so imagine what might
Michael Schumacher wrote:
There have been comments that there's too much information shown there,
and most of it isn't needed, so imagine what might change in that
regard... :)
i like customization. As long as it is well structured (and maybe accessible
only if advanced options is
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:21 PM, hOSHI wrote:
(and maybe accessible only if advanced options is checked)
Which is also usually considered as bad practice. Sorry :)
Alexandre
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Which is also usually considered as bad practice. Sorry :)
considered by whom?
in a professional tool there need to be some settings.
photoshop/3ds max/blender/maya/openoffice(grin)
they just need to be structured right.
maybe settings that are not so important
I think it's not about customization or not. Is about avoiding a
cluttered prefs menu with gazillions of options and provide smart ways
to customize instead.
Look at this for instance:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5IjbClO8Sk
(the upcoming Blender 2.5)
There you have an example of a highly
Guillermo Espertino wrote:
I think it's not about customization or not. Is about avoiding a
cluttered prefs menu with gazillions of options and provide smart ways
to customize instead.
Look at this for instance:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5IjbClO8Sk
(the upcoming Blender 2.5)
There
Hello Rahul:
i m a student and interested in gsoc project:Fast Adaptive Resampler
Tailored For Transformations Which Mostly Downsample
I have read the requirements properly for this project which also
includes jacobian transformation,box filtering algorithm and
bilinear resampling.But i am
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:37 PM, hOSHI wrote:
Which is also usually considered as bad practice. Sorry :)
considered by whom?
in a professional tool there need to be some settings.
In my long-time observation people who express their opinion in the
lines of fine with me as long as you make
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
A tool should work out of box and help getting the work done right
away. When people rely on customization instead, they *usually* create
interfaces that require customization *before* you actually can start
doing anything.
Okay i agree on that.
I really would
On Mar 10, 2009, at 8:56 AM, Nicolas Robidoux wrote:
Hello Rahul:
i m a student and interested in gsoc project:Fast Adaptive Resampler
Tailored For Transformations Which Mostly Downsample
I have read the requirements properly for this project which also
includes jacobian
Hello Craig:
Numerical Jacobian calculation is not so bad in terms of coding effort
The issue is that, if I understand correctly, GEGL's current pure
demand-driven structure means that resamplers have no information
whatsoever about what other nearby locations are being resampled, and
Hello Rahul:
Indeed, the GSoC I suggested can be roughly described as implementing
a poor man's version of the scheme Craig describes in
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004SoPh..2193D
Replace circles/ellipses by parallelograms/rectangles, and notice that
padding the singular values of the
* app/widgets/gimpdock.c: made the font scale factor for the docks
configurable in gtkrc.
* themes/Default/gtkrc
* themes/Small/gtkrc: for documentation purposes, added the
default value for GimpDock::font-scale here. Changed all style
property
This being said, what I have in mind in way simpler than what Craig
implemented. But if you understand Craig's paper, you probably
understand what I want to do.
Actually, if I took the time to completely understand Craig's paper, I
probably would understand what I want to do.
;-)
Nicolas
Rahul:
exact area box filtering with sides no less than the input image's
inter-pixel distance
This was a bit terse:
Exact area box filtering with a square box with diameter equal to the
inter-pixel distance is exactly bilinear interpolation. So, it's only
when the sides are larger than the
Pigeon wrote:
* app/widgets/gimpdock.c: made the font scale factor for the docks
configurable in gtkrc.
* themes/Default/gtkrc
* themes/Small/gtkrc: for documentation purposes, added the
default value for GimpDock::font-scale here. Changed all style
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 21:20 +0100, Pigeon wrote:
* app/widgets/gimpdock.c: made the font scale factor for the docks
configurable in gtkrc.
* themes/Default/gtkrc
* themes/Small/gtkrc: for documentation purposes, added the
default value for
Hi everyone, a passing civilian hereI want a modified version of GIMP,
but don't know anything about programming and so will not be doing the work
myself! Is there a place I can go to find developers/programmers for hire to
do the work?
--
View this message in context:
22 matches
Mail list logo