On Wednesday 22 July 2009 00:37:43 Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 18:33 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
I d'be against the removal of the vintage pixmaped brushes.
Why? Tell us a good reason then why we should keep them.
Ive done a few quite nice wallpapers with just dynamics
On 07/20/2009 06:43 AM, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:06 AM, Martin Nordholtsense...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
With the integration of tagging support in GIMP we have a mechanism that
allows us to organize resources (brushes, patterns, palettes, and
gradients). This
Indeed, they are good examples. For me, the thing is : why these examples ?
To give examples doesn't mean not to justify them.
A justification could be the need of the users, if after a study it appears
that the color Brush the most relevant to provide by default is a Pepper, I
would understand.
On 07/20/2009 10:29 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
* Add larger variants of the circle and fuzzy circle
brushes, say 50, 100, 250 and 500 px
The prerequisite for this is GIMP not playing a dying turtle that
climbs up to
On 07/20/2009 06:14 PM, Rob Antonishen wrote:
Couple quick questions...
How is it decided what scripts should be included in the core?
If they help us fulfill the product vision [1], they should be added.
For example, I have created a new script with a number of menu entries
to grow
On 07/20/2009 11:10 AM, Alexia Death wrote:
* Add larger variants of the circle and fuzzy circle
Please no, there's too many round brushes already and bigger ones would
look exactly the same and add confusion. There should not be 2 brushes
that look to be the same shape in the default set.
On 07/20/2009 03:28 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Hi,
With the integration of tagging support in GIMP we have a mechanism that
allows us to organize resources (brushes, patterns, palettes, and
gradients). This enables us to add a
On 07/20/2009 06:19 PM, Emil Assarsson wrote:
What I really miss is to be able to remove brushes that I don't need
and sort/group the ones I use a lot.
Maybe it would be better that most - if not all - of the brushes where
copied to the users profile as a default instead of being static.
I
Martin Nordholts wrote:
I get your drift, but is it really reasonable to force a user to scale a
say 250px brush to 3px if that is what he desires? It might be, but I
don't think it is with our current scaling mechanism. What do you think
Regarding this, as an user (and not a programmer),
On 07/22/2009 06:39 AM, Jonathan Wolf wrote:
Hello,
I am interested in using the GIMP logo graphic in a commercial
product under a special thanks page in the credits. Who would I need
to get in contact with to ask for permission for usage?
You would either have to comply with the license the
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009 12:03:31 +0200
Martin Nordholts ense...@gmail.com wrote:
I get your drift, but is it really reasonable to force a user to scale a
say 250px brush to 3px if that is what he desires? It might be, but I
don't think it is with our current scaling mechanism. What do you think
On 07/22/2009 12:18 PM, SHIRAKAWA Akira wrote:
Martin Nordholts wrote:
I get your drift, but is it really reasonable to force a user to scale
a say 250px brush to 3px if that is what he desires? It might be, but
I don't think it is with our current scaling mechanism. What do you think
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Easy enough, just unset the 'global-brush' property. I am not sure
though if that would make a good default for the average user.
So far I only heard from users thanks, but why is it not by default? :)
Alexandre
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 14:12, Alexandre
Prokoudinealexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Easy enough, just unset the 'global-brush' property. I am not sure
though if that would make a good default for the average user.
So far I only heard
2009/7/22 Fredrik Alströmer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 14:12, Alexandre
Prokoudinealexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Easy enough, just unset the 'global-brush' property. I am not sure
though if that would make a good default for
2009/7/22 Fredrik Alströmer r...@excu.se
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 14:12, Alexandre
Prokoudinealexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:16 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Easy enough, just unset the 'global-brush' property. I am not sure
though if that would make a good
On 07/20/2009 12:36 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions on adjustments and additions to the
default set of GIMP resources?
Thanks for the great feedback everyone. Summing it up, these are the
current desired adjustments to the default set of resources.
We should:
*
2009/7/22 David Gowers wrote:
tools. When I think about it, I wonder whether such users ever get to using
GIMP with any level of frequency or intensity, as IMO with the global-brush
option off
Don't wonder -- they do. And I do too :)
(Speaking of which, the fact that tools presets don't
Martin Nordholts wrote on Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 03:05:38PM +0200:
On 07/20/2009 12:36 AM, Martin Nordholts wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions on adjustments and additions to the
default set of GIMP resources?
Thanks for the great feedback everyone. Summing it up, these are the
On 07/22/2009 03:28 PM, Martin Cracauer wrote:
Speaking of brushes - brush rotation which currently requires a plugin
(which is a little painful to use as it isn't interactive) is high on
my wishlist.
Brush rotation is implemented in git master and will be part of GIMP 2.7.0.
/ Martin
Hi,
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com (2009-07-22 at 1218.30 +0200):
Martin Nordholts wrote:
I get your drift, but is it really reasonable to force a user to scale a
say 250px brush to 3px if that is what he desires? It might be, but I
don't think it is with our current scaling mechanism. What
Hi.
Can somebody tell me how far away GIMP is from being able to view
manipulations that you do in a different color space in real time in
real colors?
I could get along with constant recomposing to view with HSV. But I
have recently discovered the LAB colorspace which does really useful
things
On 07/22/2009 11:59 PM, Martin Cracauer wrote:
Hi.
Can somebody tell me how far away GIMP is from being able to view
manipulations that you do in a different color space in real time in
real colors?
Hi,
The current plan is get GIMP 2.8 out the door asap, hopefully within the
next few
Martin Nordholts wrote on Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:16:34AM +0200:
On 07/22/2009 11:59 PM, Martin Cracauer wrote:
Hi.
Can somebody tell me how far away GIMP is from being able to view
manipulations that you do in a different color space in real time in
real colors?
Hi,
The current plan
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 23:54 +0200, GSR - FR wrote:
I avoid scale whenever I can, so for vector brushes I just use the
brush editor.
Scaling a vector brush from the tool options is equivalent, at least
from an implementation point of view, to changing its size in the brush
editor.
Sven
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 18:53 -0400, Rob Antonishen wrote:
One reason to keep some image hose brushes in the default set is just
to demonstrate that gimp supports them! I participate in a web forum
for amateur cartography, and one of the most common requests is how to
use tubes with
On 07/23/2009 12:27 AM, Martin Cracauer wrote:
Do I understand that correctly that you will move to
single-floats/color?
Yes, virtually all image processing and compositing will be performed in
the linear light RGBA color space with 32 bit float depth per channel.
There have been discussions
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 12:10 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 07/20/2009 06:19 PM, Emil Assarsson wrote:
What I really miss is to be able to remove brushes that I don't need
and sort/group the ones I use a lot.
Maybe it would be better that most - if not all - of the brushes where
Hi,
s...@gimp.org (2009-07-23 at 0031.55 +0200):
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 23:54 +0200, GSR - FR wrote:
I avoid scale whenever I can, so for vector brushes I just use the
brush editor.
Scaling a vector brush from the tool options is equivalent, at least
from an implementation point of view, to
On 07/23/2009 12:39 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 12:10 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
On 07/20/2009 06:19 PM, Emil Assarsson wrote:
What I really miss is to be able to remove brushes that I don't need
and sort/group the ones I use a lot.
Maybe it would be better that
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 00:51 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
We could either introduce a complex system to allow the user to delete
system resources, or we could make it simple for ourselves and the user
and just initialize the user dir with a set of default resources. I
don't
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 00:48 +0200, GSR - FR wrote:
The points are the separate GUI, the mental maths required or the try
and error workflow until you find the right size for brush changes,
which are the issues the user has to cope with; versus a(n unified)
pixel size control (currently
On 07/23/2009 12:56 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 00:51 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
We could either introduce a complex system to allow the user to delete
system resources, or we could make it simple for ourselves and the user
and just initialize the user dir with a
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/22 David Gowers wrote:
tools. When I think about it, I wonder whether such users ever get to
using
GIMP with any level of frequency or intensity, as IMO with the
global-brush
option off
Martin Nordholts wrote on Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:40:06AM +0200:
On 07/23/2009 12:27 AM, Martin Cracauer wrote:
Do I understand that correctly that you will move to
single-floats/color?
[...]
If you in the yet not officially released GIMP 2.7 do View - Use GEGL,
then the layers will be
1) i agree with Alexia , get rid of all duplicates as the circle soft and
circle hard brush. If may be scaled only 1 is needed
2) most flexible brushes are that created with the brush editor that can be not
only resized but tilted, rotated,made harder or softer on the fly, even with
On 07/23/2009 04:11 AM, Martin Cracauer wrote:
I use the git version of last week. Lost my tablet (probably due to
some dbus API issue) but works otherwise.
Let me just poke some more.
And does all this survive layer copying and other changes?
Does current 2.7 carry floating
point layers
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Martin Cracauer craca...@cons.org wrote:
Martin Nordholts wrote on Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:40:06AM +0200:
On 07/23/2009 12:27 AM, Martin Cracauer wrote:
Do I understand that correctly that you will move to
single-floats/color?
[...]
If you in the
38 matches
Mail list logo
