Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread peter sikking

Liam wrote:


Right now gimp is broken for working on multiple projects (the
file/save changes have rendered it too hard to keep track of
where images are being exported) but the use case is central
(I think) to how single window needs to work.



OK, I am listening.

can you explain to me how this worked better in 2.6?

thanks,

--ps

founder + principal interaction architect
man + machine interface works

http://mmiworks.net/blog : on interaction architecture





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] I only have Gimp 2.6.7 binaries

2009-09-07 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Monday, September 7, 2009, 2:56:40, David G. wrote:

 In another Gimp related issue, in mi new Windows Vista machine Gimp 2.6.7
 crashes the graphic card driver a lot when I activate a selection markee. When
 I activate a selection markee the graphics driver starts to have problems and
 starts to flicker and shortly after that the Nvidia cards reports to me that
 the graphics system has crashed and that it has been recovered.

Are you using the latest drivers from www.nvidia.com? Anyway, even if
you are, this is not GIMP's fault, but a problem in the driver itself.

BTW, there is a GIMP 2.7.0 installer for Windows on SourceForge.

-- 
 Jernej Simončič  http://eternallybored.org/ 

It is better to have a horrible ending than to have horrors without end.
   -- Matsch's Law

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Alexandre Prokoudine
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Martin Nordholts  wrote:

 We are making pretty good progress towards GIMP 2.8 which has turned
 into an everything but GEGL release. I think it would make sense to
 also go for a single-window mode in 2.8 and not 2.10 as originally
 planned.

 By doing this we will be able to focus all resources on integrating
 GEGL once 2.8 is released. Integrating GEGL will require rather big
 changes to the code base, and I don't think having one guy working in
 parallel on another feature that requires big code changes is a good
 idea.

 A single-window mode would also turn 2.8 into a remarkable release,
 with both layer-groups and a single-window mode, none of which were
 originally planned for 2.8.

 I intend to start working on this asap, and peter will work on a UI
 spec as soon as he gets time. If you have objections, please speak up.

Martin, there always will be different opinions on the matter. The
best you can do it write such a great patch that rejecting will be as
wrong as genocide :)

Alexandre
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] I only have Gimp 2.6.7 binaries

2009-09-07 Thread Michael Schumacher
 Von: David G. for...@gimpusers.com

 In another Gimp related issue, in mi new Windows Vista machine Gimp 2.6.7
 crashes the graphic card driver a lot when I activate a selection markee.

Nvidia has corrected the bug in at least some of their drivers, you might want 
to check for updates. I think that it had been XP in the cases I've read about, 
though.

On a side note, I had a very hard time convincing users that this kind of 
problem (display flickers when using a selection in GIMP with a very specific 
Nvidia card, and others don't have the same problem) is something that should 
be reported to Nvidia. They insisted that the problem has to be in GIMP...

Don't be afraid to send reports about bug you've encountered to any company, 
insitution, service, ... . If they never hear about it, they can't fix it.


HTH,
Michael
-- 
Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3 -
sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/atbrowser
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Shashwat
Whatever you guys do. Please make it work with KDE kwin windows manager. The
current UI doesn't work with Kwin or Compiz.

The windows (toolbox and layerbox) won't stay on top if the behavior set to
utility window.

So hoping for overall better interface :)

Best of luck.

Regards

-- 
Shashwat (via www.gimpusers.com)
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 09/07/2009 07:07 PM, Shashwat wrote:
 Whatever you guys do. Please make it work with KDE kwin windows manager. The
 current UI doesn't work with Kwin or Compiz.

You'll have to file a bug report with those window managers, there's nothing
GIMP can sensibly do about them not supporting the utility window hint in a
sane way

BR,
Martin

-- 

My GIMP Blog:
http://www.chromecode.com/

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Question on mode grouping in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Rob Antonishen
I read that the layer modes are being grouped differently in 2.8 (from
gimpusers.com - Layer modes have been grouped by context for easier
use. For example, all modes that darken/brighten the image are
arranged together now.)

Is this just a UI change, or is the enum value changed as well?
Specifically, will scripts that reference layer modes using numbers
rather than the enums get broken by this?  (I am a script writer, not
a developer, so I do not have enough actual exposure/experience with
the gimp code to even know where to look for myself...)

Thanks-

Rob A
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Monty Montgomery
No objections--- mostly I would urge developers to plan what they're
going to do, make the changes, and stick to it.  I know that's always
been the plan but it doesn't feel like it when you're using the
different versions. The random UI changes that appear in each release
throw off folks who use the Gimp day to day and have to keep
relearning behaviors that they are comfortable with or have become
muscle memory over years.  It would be like ^x being remapped in every
release of emacs.  Sure the original isn't intuitive but it's far more
important to JUST STOP CHANGING IT. :-)

All the window wanking with different UI/WM behavior in every version
is just starting to feel like destructive churn :-(  I know there are
reasons, I'm just saying keep it in mind as one more competetive
pressure.

Monty
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Question on mode grouping in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Tobias Jakobs
Moin!

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 19:17, Rob Antonishenrob.antonis...@gmail.com wrote:
 I read that the layer modes are being grouped differently in 2.8 (from
 gimpusers.com - Layer modes have been grouped by context for easier
 use. For example, all modes that darken/brighten the image are
 arranged together now.)

As far as I know  there was no change since Gimp 2.0. This is a wrong
information from gimpusers.com.

Regards,
Tobias
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Alexia Death
On Monday 07 September 2009 20:13:23 Martin Nordholts wrote:
 On 09/07/2009 07:07 PM, Shashwat wrote:
  Whatever you guys do. Please make it work with KDE kwin windows manager.
  The current UI doesn't work with Kwin or Compiz.
 
 You'll have to file a bug report with those window managers, there's
  nothing GIMP can sensibly do about them not supporting the utility window
  hint in a sane way
There actually is a bug report about it against kwin. However kwin/KDE 
developers do not consider it a bug, but more like a wish list item and cant 
be bothered about implementing it. Another complaining voice might perhaps get 
someone interested.

--Alexia
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Question on mode grouping in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Michael Natterer
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 19:36 +0200, Tobias Jakobs wrote:
 Moin!
 
 On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 19:17, Rob Antonishenrob.antonis...@gmail.com wrote:
  I read that the layer modes are being grouped differently in 2.8 (from
  gimpusers.com - Layer modes have been grouped by context for easier
  use. For example, all modes that darken/brighten the image are
  arranged together now.)
 
 As far as I know  there was no change since Gimp 2.0. This is a wrong
 information from gimpusers.com.

No, the information is right, the menu was reordered.

The layer mode enum was of course not changed.

ciao,
--mitch


___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] I only have Gimp 2.6.7 binaries

2009-09-07 Thread David G.
Well the last drivers I downloaded was about three weeks ago so I think that
it may be too early too check, perhaps in a month or two and yes I did think
too that it could be an Nvidia driver problem and if a lot of users using
other graphic cards are not having the same problem that's more reason to
suspect.




 Von: David G. for...@gimpusers.com

 In another Gimp related issue, in mi new Windows Vista machine Gimp 2.6.7
 crashes the graphic card driver a lot when I activate a selection markee.

Nvidia has corrected the bug in at least some of their drivers, you might
want to check for updates. I think that it had been XP in the cases I've read
about, though.

On a side note, I had a very hard time convincing users that this kind of
problem (display flickers when using a selection in GIMP with a very specific
Nvidia card, and others don't have the same problem) is something that should
be reported to Nvidia. They insisted that the problem has to be in GIMP...

Don't be afraid to send reports about bug you've encountered to any company,
insitution, service, ... . If they never hear about it, they can't fix it.


HTH,
Michael


-- 
David G. (via www.gimpusers.com)
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Question on mode grouping in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Rob Antonishen
Thanks all, for the confirmation and clarification.

-Rob A

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Michael Natterermi...@gimp.org wrote:
 On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 19:36 +0200, Tobias Jakobs wrote:
 Moin!

 On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 19:17, Rob Antonishenrob.antonis...@gmail.com wrote:
  I read that the layer modes are being grouped differently in 2.8 (from
  gimpusers.com - Layer modes have been grouped by context for easier
  use. For example, all modes that darken/brighten the image are
  arranged together now.)

 As far as I know  there was no change since Gimp 2.0. This is a wrong
 information from gimpusers.com.

 No, the information is right, the menu was reordered.

 The layer mode enum was of course not changed.

 ciao,
 --mitch



___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] I only have Gimp 2.6.7 binaries

2009-09-07 Thread David G.
Yes I know, but those are beta releases and many people say that using the
text tool crashes their Gimp 2.7 a lot. As a general rule I avoid beta
software, not always but most of the time because I usually rather wait for
the stable release. I don't mind waiting a bit longer for the new single entry
in the task bar feature, right now I'm more concern with the graphic card
issue with the selection markee, I will report that to Nvidia just in case. If
it turns out to be a bug with the graphic driver instead of Gimp the more
users with this problem that report it to Nvidia the merrier.

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:26 AM, David G.for...@gimpusers.com wrote:
 To SorinN: I use Windows (Vista 64 bit and XP) and I only have Gimp 2.6.7
so
 far which is the one that is available for Windows now, if Gimp 2.7
creates a

Behold:

http://www.gimptalk.com/forum/gimp-2-7-beta,-last-stable-is-2-6-7-also-for-windows-t37771.html

Yea, verily.

David


-- 
David G. (via www.gimpusers.com)
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Omari Stephens
Martin Nordholts wrote:
 Hi,
 
 We are making pretty good progress towards GIMP 2.8 which has turned
 into an everything but GEGL release. I think it would make sense to
 also go for a single-window mode in 2.8 and not 2.10 as originally
 planned.
::snip? SNIP!::

Hi, all.

I might be daft, but what exactly _is_ a single-window mode.  It feels like I'm 
the odd one out, here, and that everyone else knows what's going on, but I 
can't 
really imagine that's the case.  What window are we talking about?

The phrase single-window mode really means absolutely nothing to me.  Can 
someone draw a simple mock-up to make it clear?

--xsdg
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread peter sikking

Omari Stephens wrote:

The phrase single-window mode really means absolutely nothing to  
me.  Can

someone draw a simple mock-up to make it clear?



I will blog about it soon, so you know what I am up to.

--ps

founder + principal interaction architect
man + machine interface works

http://mmiworks.net/blog : on interaction architecture





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 09:50 +0200, peter sikking wrote:
 Liam wrote:
 
  Right now gimp is broken for working on multiple projects (the
  file/save changes have rendered it too hard to keep track of
  where images are being exported) but the use case is central
  (I think) to how single window needs to work.
 
 
 OK, I am listening.
 
 can you explain to me how this worked better in 2.6?

First, note that I said right now -- although strictly speaking
I should have said a month ago, I need to update.

So there are some unfinished details, and some of these don't
matter too much individually but add up, rather like the
chairs at MacDonalds, designed to be comfortable only for
twenty minutes...

The biggest problems I have right now -- and I know ways to
address the biggest have been discussed -- are

(1) file-export as (regardless of what it's called) goes
to the wrong directory: it needs default to the same
directory as save as, that is, the directory with
the original-precious-image.  I could happily live with
a preference for default export directory, but My Documents
really, really doesn't cut it outside of a family's
computer for saving snapshots... (Desktop would be as bad)

(2) there's no menu in the toolbox, and if you have the toolbox
and no image window, you have to open a minimsed image
window just to get to file-new

Use case:
.  scan an image.  Maybe export it to
   scannd-images/Vesalius/raw-pages/folio309.png
   for archiving.
   
   Work on it, off and on, during the course of the day.

   Save it to
   scanned-images/Vesalius/cleaned/folio309.png
   for archiving when done, and then (maybe an
   hour or two later) make 5 jpeg images at
   different sizes, all to be exported to
   scanned-images/Vesalius/jpeg/

 . Meanwhile, use open image in gimp on an
   interesting photo of a rock that someone pasted
   into IRC.  Hmm, let's try levels-auto on that
   and export to /tmp (or Desktop, don't care)
   to send back for a discussion about the
   algorithm

 . at the same time I'm editing a photo I took for
   work, but that's on hold for an hour waiting
   someone to get back from lunch

 . I work on the photo for a bit.  Then I minimise
   it so I have the scan and the work photo minimised in
   the task bar, and the rock photo open.  I edited it,
   export it (where?) and close it.

 . Now I just have the GIMP toolbox visible, and no
   image windows.

 . The person at work is back but wants me to try something
   new, so I have to make a new image.  Hmm, I have a gimp
   toolbox but no File menu, that's fucked.  Let's have at
   least a right-click menu on the toolbox drop area please,
   with File and Window.

 . Now I go to save (or export) that Vesalius scan.  Is it
   the first time I've exported? can't tell.  Where does
   it want to put the image? My Bloody Documents.  So now
   I find a terminal window, navigate to th directory with
   the Vesalius images, do pwd, copy the result, and paste
   it into the file chooser and hit enter.  Oops, overwrote
   the filename, hit cancel and start again.  It's fun, this.

 . OK, back to the work photo, time to do file-export.
   Where will it go? Where was I when I was working on it?



So I'm working in parallel on several different projects, each with
their own folders, and I'd actually be just as happy in many ways with
three entirely separate gimp instances... and starting an entirely new
gimp for a new image so I'd get the menus.

Sorry for a long posting, I hope it's a bit clearer.  There are some
other details like the export dialogues having 'save instead of
overwrite or export on them that might already have been fixed.

A pull-down of active and recent directories on the file choosers
would help, but not as much as having bookmarks + the current
image's export directory starting off the same as the import or
save directory.

A final note -- I scale the image, export as jpeg, sharpen,
scale again, sharpen come back half an hour later and want to know
at which points I exported as jpeg; with 2.4, I could undo repeatedly
until the * in the image window went away, and that was when I'd saved
as png.  An icon in the undo history would help a lot here.


Hope this helps!

Liam



-- 
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Karl Günter Wünsch
On Monday 07 September 2009, Martin Nordholts wrote:
 On 09/07/2009 07:07 PM, Shashwat wrote:
  Whatever you guys do. Please make it work with KDE kwin windows manager. 
The
  current UI doesn't work with Kwin or Compiz.
 
 You'll have to file a bug report with those window managers, there's nothing
 GIMP can sensibly do about them not supporting the utility window hint in a
 sane way
You mean something like: 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177025
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178074

If you know of other people complaining, maybe we may sway the developers of 
KDE to do something about it by combining the reports. I have little hope 
though...
regards
Karl Günter
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Karl Günter Wünsch
On Saturday 05 September 2009, Martin Nordholts wrote:
 A single-window mode would also turn 2.8 into a remarkable release,
 with both layer-groups and a single-window mode, none of which were
 originally planned for 2.8.
Why not have it both ways - by simply making the toolboxes dockable... 
That's the way many programs handle things like that and it's working like a 
charm. IMHO this would sort out any complaints about a change in usability as 
the undocked toolboxes could behave as they would currently...
regards
Karl Günter
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Tobias Jakobs
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 17:49, Martin Nordholtsense...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi,

 We are making pretty good progress towards GIMP 2.8 which has turned
 into an everything but GEGL release. I think it would make sense to
 also go for a single-window mode in 2.8 and not 2.10 as originally
 planned.

Please come back on topic. The question was not if or how. The if is
answered by Martin with a yes and the how will be written down by
Peter. The question was if in 2.8 or in 2.10?

I think this can't be answered before we see what Peter has designed.
So this complete discussion is pointless.

Regards,
Tobias
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Question on mode grouping in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Tobias Jakobs
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 19:47, Michael Natterermi...@gimp.org wrote:
 On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 19:36 +0200, Tobias Jakobs wrote:
 Moin!

 On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 19:17, Rob Antonishenrob.antonis...@gmail.com wrote:
  I read that the layer modes are being grouped differently in 2.8 (from
  gimpusers.com - Layer modes have been grouped by context for easier
  use. For example, all modes that darken/brighten the image are
  arranged together now.)

 As far as I know  there was no change since Gimp 2.0. This is a wrong
 information from gimpusers.com.

 No, the information is right, the menu was reordered.

Oh, sorry. I must have missed that.

Regards,
Tobias
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] Question on mode grouping in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Martin Nordholts
On 09/07/2009 07:49 PM, Rob Antonishen wrote:
 Thanks all, for the confirmation and clarification.

For reference, here is the gimp-developer thread leading up to the 
rearrangements:
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2008-November/thread.html#21099

 / Martin

-- 

My GIMP Blog:
http://www.chromecode.com/

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] We should go for a single-window mode in 2.8

2009-09-07 Thread Shashwat
Not that one.. I am talking about this
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172615

There are lots of people and duplicate bug report for the same but never
fixed :(

On Monday 07 September 2009, Martin Nordholts wrote:
 On 09/07/2009 07:07 PM, Shashwat wrote:
  Whatever you guys do. Please make it work with KDE kwin windows manager.

The
  current UI doesn't work with Kwin or Compiz.
 
 You'll have to file a bug report with those window managers, there's
nothing
 GIMP can sensibly do about them not supporting the utility window hint in
a
 sane way
You mean something like: 
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177025
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178074

If you know of other people complaining, maybe we may sway the developers of

KDE to do something about it by combining the reports. I have little hope 
though...
regards
Karl Gunter


-- 
Shashwat (via www.gimpusers.com)
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer