What platform are you on? I presume a form of Windows given that you
have a task manager, but what version?
Lourens
Ronald Cornelissen wrote:
L.S.,
When I open a dialog box wich involves plug-ins (i.e. Xtns Plugin Details... or
when I try to save a picture) the box pops up, but
stays
I tried it, and it looks very wrong indeed. Try creating the circle,
then blurring at 48x48, then using treshold. The circle has changed into
a weird shape. I took a look at the gaussian blur plugin but was unable
to positively identify a bug. I do however have an idea as to what might
be
Hmm, this post seems to have turned into a big mess. It was
late...Anyway, please respond to this one, as the others have the
reply-to set wrongly. For the record, I'm referring to
http://www.mail-archive.com/gimp-developer@lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/msg00359.html
Lourens
Ok, first idea for poll:
-Do you use the bucket-fill
1. All the time
2. I normally use fill with foreground/background-color
3. Only to fill with pattern.
4. What is bucket fill?
Ralf
Hmm, I use the bucket fill all the time, both for patterns and filling
selections. If I want to fill
Peter wrote:
I found how to change the comment in a JPEG when I save as, and how to
change the default for the save as, but I could not find how to view
the comment in an input file or edit the comment prior to performing a
normal save.
I think this is built in the save routines, I don't
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
this sounds reasonable to me. On the other hand, this would render the
bucket fill tool almost useless since you can do the color and pattern
fill much easier using DND. The sole advantage of the Bucket Fill tools
is the threshold functionality and the fact that
Peter wrote:
Can GIMP be started with all the windows grouped the way I want?
It simply reloads the previous configuration on Linux. But I don't know
about the Windows version.
That way, when I am in GIMP, the whole screen is working the Gimp way,
and when I am in Word, the whole screen
Kelly Martin wrote:
[snip]
If GTK stable release (1.2) is not acceptable for further development
in the GIMP (which it probably is not), I would strongly urge picking
a relatively stable snapshot of GTK+ current development (possibly,
but not necessarily HEAD today) and use that. We might
Alright, this is turning into a flamewar and that's the least productive
of all. Let me try to wrap up this discussion:
The question: Will the gimp-1.3 developer releases depend on Gtk-1.3
HEAD CVS, or do we make certain every gimp-1.3.x release compiles with
gtk-1.3.y?
Arguments for depending
Kelly Martin wrote:
Think plugin authors. These people are going to want to start
working on porting their plugins to 2.0 well in advance of 2.0's
release but are not likely to want to cope with being GTK debuggers on
top of being GIMP debuggers.
Kelly
I may be misunderstanding, I'm
Stephen Robert Norris wrote:
Yes, this is a way the application can avoid the problem; it's not a way
the library can.
My point was that it's impossible with modern OS's to avoid the possibility
of the library crashing.
Ah, we agree then, that was the point I was trying to make as well
Stephen Robert Norris wrote:
I'd be interested to know how to avoid that. I'm pretty sure I can
construct a scenario (with multiple threads and memory mapping,
for example) where it's impossible to tell until you get the SEGV. For
instance, I memory map a file, pass a pointer into the mapped
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 02:18, Branko Collin wrote:
snip
3. A page on the GIMP site should be dedicated to the topic of How
to
transition from Photoshop to the GIMP successfully. The
community would be a lot larger if more people realized that 'you
get what you pay
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 13:10, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
snip
I can imagine professional use of a program without any of these
things these days (the font stuff is most likely to be an issue). A
lot of printers that get professional use have Mac/Windows drivers
that take exclusively RGB
On Tuesday 27 November 2001 14:50, Seth Burgess wrote:
snip
Allow me to correct some impressions...
Very little has happened recently in the way of scripts or filters; saying
that gimp developers concentrate on that is ridiculous.
Sorry, my bad. Jargon problem it seems. In Gimp, scripts and
On Wednesday 28 November 2001 15:17, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Lourens Veen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, so I misjudged the state of development Gimp is in. I remember
trying to find out some time ago how hard it would be to contribute
things to Gimp, but I gave up pretty soon.
could
On Monday 17 December 2001 20:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Is there some combination of existing functions that would let
you re-compose an image as:
0% red, 50% green, 50% blue (i.e., a red-blocking filter)
Is there some way to use blending of layers and opacity to do
this? Or
On Monday 17 December 2001 20:47, Lourens Veen wrote:
snip - complicated stuff
I just realised that you could just add a layer with colour (0, 255, 255) and
put it in front of your image, then set its layer mode to multiply. Much
easier. Brightness might be a problem though, make sure your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
With people talking on this list about plugin distribution and management
again recently, I figured it'd be nice to have some document which is worked
out a bit more than the ideas that have been thrown up so far. So I've
started to make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 20:39, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
snip
if I'm informed correctly someone is already working on a plug-in manager
but I'd like him to speak up here on himself.
If you're reading this, yes, please do so. That'll save me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 15 January 2002 21:14, you wrote:
Hi,
snip
I said with the current design. A plug-in manager should definitely
be designed to also work for pluggable tools (Bex, how would I spell
this correctly?) which is something we definitely want
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 17 January 2002 17:44, Dave Neary wrote:
Please, please, please try to get this right. When discussing GIMP, it
is NEVER Gimp. It is NEVER plugin. GIMP has plug-ins.
Surely The GIMP (or the GIMP) has plug-ins? :-)
Must be THE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 22 January 2002 21:10, Carol Spears wrote:
what is a good, generic, quick way to find which version of glib you
have installed on your computer?
glib-config --version
Lourens
- --
GPG public key:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I've been working on a design document for a plug-in distribution system for
The GIMP. I paid a visit to #gimp today to ask a question, and was told that
yosh was working on plug-in management as well. I wanted to finish my
document
On Saturday 16 February 2002 00:06, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero
wrote:
Hi:
This is the doc I have now. Any comments? Suggestions? Fixes?
Well done! I still have some comments though, see below.
snipped lots of stuff I think atm is fine
Xtns
Script-Fu
Tools
On Saturday 16 February 2002 06:59, Marco Lamberto wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
Zoom In + [Yes, changed, a bit more logical, no?]
Zoom Out-
If you have an US keyboard you'll notice that while the minus
On Saturday 16 February 2002 09:29, Lourens Veen wrote:
I'd like to define a Tool as something that changes the image depending on
the coordinates sent by the pointer device. This means that Flip and
Transform (which always work on the whole image or the whole selection)
aren't tools at all
On Thursday 28 March 2002 01:40, Branko Collin wrote:
Hi,
Argh! Rather late, I put up the press release I promised to make
at http://www.xs4all.nl/~collin/gimp/pr/gimp123pr.html.
If you want to comment on it, please go ahead.
I think I found one small language error. In the last paragraph
On Fri 29 November 2002 18:33, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002 11:29:12 -0500, Patrick McFarland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw, has there been a discussion on how layer grouping will
work? I want to be able to both group layers in just a group
(aka doesnt change how rendering
On Mon 2 December 2002 21:35, David Weeks wrote:
I fixed all my windows bugs:
0) Backup your data.
1) Boot from rescue disk, no CD support (or don't worry for
win95, that had to be made manually).
2) Utilize the Microsoft built, Microsoft bug squashing tool:
fdisk 3) In fdisk you'll likely
30 matches
Mail list logo
