Re: [Gimp-developer] http://developer.gimp.org/

2003-02-07 Thread Niklas
Hi,

I have done a small test design based on the design that drc has done
and also drc has helped me to make the test developers site look good
with the changing of colors and images. The test site can be located
here: http://devel.helloween.kicks-ass.org/

But remember that this is a test design. Now I know that Raphaël wants
to do the scripts so I have a suggestion: I can do the design and
Raphaël can do the scripts and the content of the site.

What do you think Raphaël?

And I would also like to thank drc with the help of my weird ideas.

Regards,
-- 
Niklas [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] http://developer.gimp.org/

2003-02-10 Thread Niklas
Hi,

On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 13:37, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
 That looks nice.  That design looks vaguely familiar...  ;-)

It should look familiar.I think you might know the reason to why it
should look familiar.

 I am not sure that the front page should have some kind of news,
 though.  Having up-to-date information for the main site will be hard
 enough.  History shows that everybody is excited at first and supplies
 a lot of news, but this slows down after a while and it is difficult
 to keep the site alive.  So it would probably be better to keep the
 news part for the main site only.  The home page of the developers'
 site would only have a set of links to the important sections of the
 site, even if this duplicates some parts of the navigation bar.

Yes, but what should be here instead? Some info about what
developer.gimp.org is?

 That's fine for me.  There are only a few requirements that I would
 like to put on the design:
 - It should be clean XHTML 1.0 (or at least HTML 4.01).  It looks like
   this is already the case.
 - The page design should not include too many images or complex
   (D)HTML stuff.  Again, it looks like this is fine already.
 - There should be some kind of revision control system (such as CVS)
   for the contents of the pages.  This reduces potential problems if
   there is more than one webmaster for the pages.
 - For those editing the pages, the contents should be clearly
   separated from the template.  This means that all source files
   should only contain the body of the pages (without header, footer or
   navigation bar) and some build system should be able to apply the
   template to these source files to generate the final HTML pages. (*)
 - The source files (under revision control) and generated files should
   be in different directories.  Ideally, it should be possible to
   rebuild everything by typing make in the source directory.
 - The generated HTML files should be static: no server-side includes,
   PHP, Perl or other fancy stuff that would put additional
   requirements on the server.
 - It should be possible to integrate some pages that are not using
   the same templates.  This will be useful for the documentation pages
   generated by gtk-doc.

All this is no problem at all. The big problem in this case would be the
CVS stuff for the developer.gimp.org, I don't have knowledge enough to
create a CVS-server for the site. Any ideas?

 So if this is fine for you, then I would be happy to work together
 with you on the update of the developers' site.

That is great, I would be more then happy to work with the design.

Regards,
-- 
Niklas [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-web] Re: [Gimp-developer] http://developer.gimp.org/

2003-02-12 Thread Niklas
Hi,

On Wed, 2003-02-12 at 19:15, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
 Anyway, I have a question about the design that you (Niklas) are
 proposing: did you use a set of scripts to add the template (header,
 footer, menu) around the page contents, or is every page created by hand?

The page is created by hand. And I am trying to make some changes in the
include files to make it easier to validate and also easier to
understand. (I hope). So there will be a temp.html file for you to look
at. 

 Is the editing done at the HTML level, or do you use some tools to
 generate all or parts of the page from a different markup language or
 from a simpler version of the HTML code?

It is all HTML but this is also XHTML strict so the content of the site
uses div/div and p/p for the main content, the rest of the
structures are in the css file. So this is more XHTML then HTML. This
makes the site beutiful to work with. :)

div class=aclassThis is a title/div
p
  Here we have some info
/p

That is all sort of. But then again this depends a lot on what you want
the file to include.

Regards,
-- 
Niklas [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] storke selection?

2003-12-28 Thread Niklas
sön 2003-12-28 klockan 22.35 skrev Gezim Hoxha:
 Hi guys/girls,
 
 I'm really frustrated with the storke tool in gimp
 1.3.23, and I hope it's because of my ignorance.
 Almost all selections (except rectangular ones) turn
 out really ugly when storked...here is an example with
 a circle 
  http://www.geocities.com/hgezim/stroke.html
 Please help me out.
 
 Thanks in advance,
 Gezim
 
 p.s.: I also tried it with the paint brush but the
 results were not better.

Hello,

There are many ways to make a stroke to the selection. First one is the
way to use Stroke selection. The other one is:

1. Make a selection.
2. Fill it with the color you want the border to be
3. Go image-Selection-Shrink and in that dialog shrink with the 1px
if the border is going to be 1px in size.
4. Ctrl+K or image-Edit-Clear

This will clear the rest of the color out in the middle of the selection
and you should have a border. Don't know if this is what you want
though.

Regards,
-- 
Niklas Mattisson scizzoNOSPAM-at-sector7-dot-nu

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] GIMPCon 2004 in Norway

2004-06-05 Thread Niklas
Hello gimp lists,

We are getting close to have the GIMPCon 2004 in Norway and I would like
to say that I am going to GIMPCon, at the same time I would like to ask
who else is going to Norway?

So now to the point of this mail. It would be good if we could have a
small meeting conserning the website(s) at GIMPCon. This would help alot
now when the websites are being worked on really hard. At the moment I
haven't had time to setup any list of things we should discuss but it
would be really good to have this kind of meeting
now. 
To my questions then:
Who will attend at the meeting?
Any suggestions from the outside about problems conserning the
website?
I hope this mail is at least a little informative and that people will
join us at GIMPCon. I will later create a little list on my own about
things that I find would be good to discuss at the conference and then
announce it here on this
list.   
Regards,
-- 
Niklas Mattisson scizzoNOSPAM-at-sector7-dot-nu

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Getting Involved section on new site

2003-08-24 Thread Niklas Mattisson
Hey all,

It seems like there is a lot of questions about how we should structure
the Getting Involved section and I would like to make a few things clear
here and also prupose a little structure.

- We should use the existing file that contains the changelog updates
and such things. 

- The image. I like it though it takes a lot of place on the site. Do
the developers want it there or do you think that it might be a little
to much?

- IMHO I would remove the Important URLs parts and move this to Links
well the once that is not in the Links section at least.

- Important GIMP Development URLs is important and I would like this to
stay where it is.

OK here goes a little structure:

- Getting Involved
|-- How can I help?
|-- How Tos(If we have any?)
|-- What is going on
'-- Links  (OS specific help pages)

This might be small but still it would not be much to change if we build
it like this for now. This can change later also depending what the
developers want the site to contain.

What do the developers want the site section to look like and is there
anything that I have missed above?

I would like to have some discussions about this because it is important
to make this section understandable and useful for new people who wants
to help with GIMP. So please add comments.

Best regards,
-- 
Niklas Mattisson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Path tutorials

2004-01-23 Thread Niklas Mattisson
Hello everyone,

Today I uploaded a new update of my website. The updates might not be
big but at least they should do some help.

There has been questions about Path Tutorials both on the developers
list and the user list, so I thought I might give it a try. Right now I
have two tutorial for the GIMP 2.0 paths and they are located at:

http://scizzo.gimp.org/gimp/Paths_Basics/
http://scizzo.gimp.org/gimp/Paths_Basics2/

In the second one I have also added a small section that explains some
of the new things included in the stroke dialog which I have had a lot
of help with from all of the developers. Thank you for helping me do the
tutorials and don't be afraid to send me feedback on them.

Regards,
-- 
Niklas Mattisson scizzoNOSPAM-at-gimp-dot-org

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-03 Thread Niklas Mattisson
tis 2004-02-03 klockan 11.02 skrev Roman Joost:
 We're going to make a first release of the gimp-help-2. 
 
 I want to inform the authors, to have a look over their written content
 and make sure, that the release will not include major spelling or
 grammar errors. The freeze of the sources will be on
 next wednesday the 11th.
   
 Hopefully, this release will get some more attention of writing content
 and fixing tiny errors for the manual.
 
 So, keep up the good work and let me know if there are any problems regarding
 the release.
 
 Greetings,

Hey,

I will actually have problems getting the Swedish translation done
before next wednesday. I have had so much in school at the moment and
done so many other things at the same time that I have been kind of away
of all the translations. However this weekend I will try to get more
done at least most of the toolbox translations.

Best regards,
-- 
Niklas Mattisson scizzoNOSPAM-at-gimp-dot-org

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-03 Thread Niklas Mattisson
Hey again,

Actually I have a few other things to remind everyone.

* in src/toolbox/menu.xml the section about GIMP Online is still not
translated that much. Not as far as I can see at least. That is
translated and updated after I did the move of the object.

* src/toolbox/tool-*.xml should change the line Tool Call to something
else. This is not correct english and I can't seem to find good
translation for the words either. The fact is that I have tried in a irc
channel where there is a lot of translators and they said that I should
bugreport this because it is not correct, and I agree with them that it
sounds weird.

Those are actually the main things I have been looking at right now.

Hope that everyone understands what I am talking about.

Regards,
-- 
Niklas Mattisson scizzoNOSPAM-at-gimp-dot-org

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp-help-2 preperations for our 1st release

2004-02-03 Thread Niklas Mattisson
Hi,

After discussions on IRC I made the desition to make a bugreport about
the problems with Tool Call for the docs. The report is located at:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133353

Also I talked to Sven and the others and according to Sven the word
freeze is perhaps not well chosen. The release will be a pre release. 

But like roman said this release is here to get people more interested
to start working harder with the docs and to get tests done.

Best regards,
-- 
Niklas Mattisson scizzoNOSPAM-at-gimp-dot-org

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] A few website ideas

2004-07-16 Thread Niklas Mattisson
Hello lists,

So its been a little while since the GimpCon was and I was hoping to put
my ideas together a little better then I have them now but I will try to
explain the ideas that I have as good as possible.

New things:

* User-FAQ - This needs to be added to the website as soon as possible.
I do not think we have problems with questions but problems with how to
design the FAQ.

However at the moment I think it would be really good to clean the old
old FAQ and add questions that reflects on 2.0. Rockwlrs and I spoke
about this a little at GimpCon because I knew that he has been working
with the questions before. 

* Documentation - Is needed to provide users and developers with the new
documentation, we also need to have the different languages on the
website. This should be able to be done by using some sort of script or
buildsystem for the documentation. 

Anyone that has any good ideas about how to do this in a really good way
so that we can update it easily? 
And so that the languages gets updated also? Maybe be able to update
language by language also?

Website style:
---
* Hidding submenus - The menu is starting to grow and it would be good
to make it hide some of the submenus. As soon as you enter the main
section of the link you click on, the submenus will appear. This might
help a little in improving the view also to where you are in the menu.

This idea also gives us a little problem, the menus need to be named in
a way that is understandable and straightforward to the user. Example:

Documentation
  '- Tutorials

Having Documentation as the main section name is not really telling me
that here you can get a lot of different help instead it is telling me
that here you will find some cool documentation. But if we name it:

Help
  |- Documentation
  '- Tutorials

It should say that quot;here you can get some helpquot;. Maybe I am
wrong, but
this is some of the things I am looking at right now.


The ideas above are only some of the things that I am looking at right
now, but they are the major big parts that I would like to see more
discussions about on the lists. Take a look at the ideas and give me and
the others on the gimp-web list some feedback. And remember..they
are ideas to improve and help.

Regards,
-- 
Niklas Mattisson scizzoNOSPAM-at-gimp-dot-org

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Website updates for 2.2 release

2004-10-28 Thread Niklas Mattisson
Hello everyone,

So time has come to start thinking about the information provided on the
website before the 2.2 release is out. The first thing that is needed is
some information on how to update from 2.0 to 2.2 and how to have 2.0
and 2.2(-preX) installed side-by-side.

This is a great time for everyone that wants to help with the website to
come forward and help. If you are interested then join the gimp-web list
and help to start discussions and even help with the information on the
website.

As all may understand what the main reason is for the updates is to keep
up-to-date with the application itself and so we need to start thinking
about making 2.0 information into 2.2.

At the moment I do not have a list of TODOs but I am sure with this mail
that we all can start discussing the different places that needs
updating and what would be good to add to the site. 

Right now we just need to start thinking about the information that
needs updating and not adding new sections etc. So please come with
ideas and help us to get a even better website then it was before.

Regards,
-- 
Niklas Mattisson scizzoNOSPAM-at-gimp-dot-org

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer


[Gimp-developer] Not quiting just changing status

2004-12-13 Thread Niklas Mattisson
Hello GIMP developers/users,

I have had some time to think now and it seems that maybe I should not
be incharge of the website. The reasons for this is as follows:

* My work takes a lot of my time, sometimes I am not home until 22:00
swedish time. This makes it hard to actually sit and do something at the
computer after work hours.

* I have been away for to long and am not really taking care of things
enough to make the site grow as it should by this time. Yes, I made
promises and have tried to keep them, but I never thought that my work
would be like this.

* I have to many other things going on around me right now that takes up
my time and I do not want that to affect the websites development.
Instead I would like the site to grow, and for that reason there needs
to be a stronger person than me and more flexible that can handle the
site.

I am not reassigning right now. And I am not telling you that I won't be
able to help with the site, instead I would like to be a contributer to
the website and help at the areas that I know. But having the website as
the responsibility is not really good for me or for the users. To be
really honest...I don't think I am technical enough for this kind of
responsibility.

I will keep looking at things until a final decision has been made about
who can take over this task. I'm sorry that this should happen right
now. But like I said...I can help...but not be responsible.

Best regards,
--
Niklas Mattisson

___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer