Re: [Gimp-developer] scanner support should be File-Acquire
I agree with you, also the other stuff related to creation(button, etc) should go somewhere else in gimp. I too didn´t even know gimp had scanner support ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Help with new default resources in 2.8
I don´t know if this helps, but there is already the GIMP GPS resources and I heard about GIMP painter, you could check with their authors to use what they have made, They would love having their work on GIMP. Em Qua, 2010-07-07 às 06:58 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine escreveu: On 7/6/10, Martin Nordholts wrote: Hi all, If you would like better default resources in GIMP, now is a great opportunity to do something about it. We want GIMP 2.8 to ship with a good set of default resources, but we need help from our artist community with this. This is perhaps quite offtopic, but if it was possible to save guides in GIMP templates, the existing collection of them could be improved as well. Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] remove layer should not force you to last selected layer
I understood gimp 2.7 will fix this kind of problem, if that´s the case, then I will be waiting for 2.7. About Jerry way of doing things I think it makes more sense (at least) to me. I do not know very well how to use your script but I´ll find a way to give it a shot buddy. Em Sex, 2010-03-05 às 15:16 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno escreveu: On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Akkana Peck akk...@shallowsky.com wrote: Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira writes: Also I do not mind much about not having a selected layer after the deletion of a layer. But the forced viewer scroll down( or up ), depending of the last selected layer is a problem. This used to annoy me a lot, because I frequently want to delete, say, the top 5 layers. But once I figured out what it was doing, I developed a habit of clicking on the layers I want to delete in sequence before deleting. For instance, click on the 5th layer from the top, then the 4th, and so on until I get to the top; then click Delete 5 times. It sounds tedious but it doesn't take long at all -- certainly it's a lot faster than scrolling back up each time. Try it -- you may find that it solves the problem. yes, I do that as well. The new Layer Groups feature in 2.7 will ease this and several other workflows a whole lot. (For example, probably all the layers you are deleting, if more than one, would not be themselves part of the same group - you just have to delete the group) js -- ...Akkana ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] gimp shouldn´t save if no chang es were made( trivial idea )
Hi, I was advised to post these kind of ideas to developer mailing lists, so here I am. The link to the original post in bugzilla is below: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611765 What do you think of this? Also sorry again Sven ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
[Gimp-developer] remove layer should not force you to last selected layer
Hi again, the original discussion is in the link below: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611758 I was advised to present this idea here, what do you think? Also I do not mind much about not having a selected layer after the deletion of a layer. But the forced viewer scroll down( or up ), depending of the last selected layer is a problem. ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] gimp shouldn´t save if no chang es were made( trivial idea )
I see your point...haven´t thought of it, thanks buddy. Now if someone cames with the same idea I can answer accordingly Em Qui, 2010-03-04 às 21:50 -0500, Liam R E Quin escreveu: On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 23:14 -0300, Luiz Felipe Moraes Pereira wrote: Hi, I was advised to post these kind of ideas to developer mailing lists, so here I am. The link to the original post in bugzilla is below: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611765 What do you think of this? What if you save to a USB thumb drive, remove the thumb drive, then insert another one? Or what if you accidentally remove the file in the file manager after saving? Several other programs I use have this feature, but I think it's a mistake. You can tell from the * in the title bar whether the image is dirty or not. Liam ___ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
