Indeed, they are good examples. For me, the thing is : why these examples ?
To give examples doesn't mean not to justify them.
A justification could be the need of the users, if after a study it appears
that the color Brush the most relevant to provide by default is a Pepper, I
would understand. Unfortunately, I don't think so.
I could also totally understand if someone justifies it by saying it's for
historical reason, the Pepper is a symbol for Gimp.
Moreover I think I'm not mistaken if I say that a large set of casual users
keep using Gimp with the default brush set and don't add custom ones. My
opinion would be that the more useful brushes they have, the more they will
feel creative. This is why I think Gimp should be shipped with a large set
of useful brushes.
Steren
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Rob Antonishen
rob.antonis...@gmail.comwrote:
One reason to keep some image hose brushes in the default set is just
to demonstrate that gimp supports them! I participate in a web forum
for amateur cartography, and one of the most common requests is how to
use tubes with photoshop. Most are extremely impressed that this
capability exists in Gimp.
-Rob A
On 7/21/09, Sven Neumann s...@gimp.org wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 18:33 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
I d'be against the removal of the vintage pixmaped brushes.
Why? Tell us a good reason then why we should keep them.
Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
