Re: [Gimp-developer] Big Fat Piggy Gimp

2001-06-12 Thread Raphael Quinet
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, Big, Fat Piggy Gimp Fans, here's a very small patch that should fix our huge leak: [...] I don't consider this a clean solution but since it's a very small change, we should be able to evaluate easily if it is a correct fix. A better fix

Re: [Gimp-developer] Big Fat Piggy Gimp

2001-06-11 Thread Austin Donnelly
Layer deletes are a little funky: they don't get deleted when they are removed from the layer list, since they get pushed on the undo stack. They get deleted when the undo information is freed, ie when it expires or when it is on the redo stack and an new action is pushed on the undo stack, thus

Re: [Gimp-developer] Big Fat Piggy Gimp

2001-06-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Garry R. Osgood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What bemuses me is this sink-but-not-really-sink policy for layers and channels that prevails around 1.2.1 tile mismanagement, and which finds partial realization in layer_ref(). [layer.c-CVS-1.72.2.1 gimp-1-2] This brief little snippet

Re: [Gimp-developer] Big Fat Piggy Gimp

2001-06-11 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Big, Fat Piggy Gimp Fans, here's a very small patch that should fix our huge leak: Index: app/gimpimage.c === RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gimp/app/Attic/gimpimage.c,v retrieving revision 1.121.2.1 diff -u -r1.121.2.1 gimpimage.c ---