Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp 1.3.22

2003-11-25 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Tor Lillqvist writes: Then the build should be removed from gimp's line in CVSROOT/modules . Will this have some odd consequences, or can it be done right away? Anyone object? It might be that people will have to re-get gimp from CVS if build is removed from gimp's line in CVSROOT/modules.

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp 1.3.22

2003-11-25 Thread Malcolm Tredinnick
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 17:22, Tor Lillqvist wrote: Tor Lillqvist writes: Then the build should be removed from gimp's line in CVSROOT/modules . Will this have some odd consequences, or can it be done right away? Anyone object? It might be that people will have to re-get gimp from CVS

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp 1.3.22

2003-11-19 Thread Hans Breuer
At 06:37 17.11.03 +, Tor Lillqvist wrote: I wrote: If you are using MSVC, I guess the real question is, is there any chance that we will be able to claim supporting a MSVC build out of the box with a straight face? Hans Breuer writes: Probably not, at least not until the issues

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp 1.3.22

2003-11-16 Thread Tor Lillqvist
I wrote: If you are using MSVC, I guess the real question is, is there any chance that we will be able to claim supporting a MSVC build out of the box with a straight face? Hans Breuer writes: Probably not, at least not until the issues outlined in

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp 1.3.22

2003-11-04 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: and also libgimpbase/gimpwin32-io.h That probably should be added to libgimbase/Makefile.am's EXTRA_DIST? The EXTRA_HEADERS macro doesn't seem to be used for anything in the generated Makefile? I don't think EXTRA_HEADERS is a valid automake

Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp 1.3.22

2003-11-04 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Sven Neumann writes: I am not sure about the purpose of libgimpbase/gimpwin32-io.h. Is it used only in the GIMP source tree or is it supposed to be installed so external plug-ins can use it as well? I assume it is to be used only in the source tree. Anyway, it should certainly be added

[Gimp-developer] Re: Gimp 1.3.22

2003-11-03 Thread Tor Lillqvist
(Redirected to gimp-developer) Is there any special reason that (almost?) all win32-specific stuff seems to be missing from release tarballs No. The reason is nobody has tried to build for Win32 from a tarball, so nobody has noticed... or at least not reported her problems. (the same thing