Re: [Gimp-developer] comparison of enlargements produced with two GIMP methods, three GEGL methods, and three candidate GEGL methods

2010-06-05 Thread Nicolas Robidoux
In light of some feedback received, me and my students will be making major changes to three of the gegl methods, so you may want to wait until the comparisons are updated. Nicolas Robidoux On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Nicolas Robidoux nicolas.robid...@gmail.com wrote: To illustrate the

Re: [Gimp-developer] comparison of enlargements produced with two GIMP methods, three GEGL methods, and three candidate GEGL methods

2010-06-04 Thread Nicolas Robidoux
To illustrate the effect of the samplers when ROTATING images, I put together a comparative test. It shows the results of rotating a quite sharp image of astronauts near the space station---if I remember correctly---by 6.5 degrees with four GIMP methods, three GEGL methods and three candidate GEGL

Re: [Gimp-developer] comparison of enlargements produced with two GIMP methods, three GEGL methods, and three candidate GEGL methods

2010-06-03 Thread Nicolas Robidoux
To illustrate the effect of the samplers on images from the opposite end of the spectrum (text as opposed to natural), I have put together a similar comparison with a text image created with GIMP. It shows 9.73x enlargements with two GIMP methods, three GEGL methods, and three candidate GEGL

Re: [Gimp-developer] comparison of enlargements produced with two GIMP methods, three GEGL methods, and three candidate GEGL methods

2010-06-03 Thread Sven Neumann
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 23:49 -0400, Nicolas Robidoux wrote: I have created 6.11x enlargements with two GIMP methods, three GEGL methods, and three candidate GEGL methods for which patches are provided in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619314 The enlargements, named a.png to