On 8/26/05, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Nathan Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2.3 is a development version with no API guarantees whatsoever. The
API is constantly changing and noone should be developing any
plug-ins for it.
If you have such a closed Gimp Club
Hi,
I am not going to respond on your mail in detail, mainly for lack of
time. Lots of good points being made and taken. However I would like
to state that I am not at all unwilling to mentor new developers. I
also think that our (and that includes mine) attitude towards new
ideas and requests
On 8/26/05, Nathan Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/26/05, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Make it possible to indicate that a plug-in requires GIMP 2.2
2.3, and 2.4 options would be nice here too, I suppose. And also,
On 8/27/05, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am not going to respond on your mail in detail, mainly for lack of
time. Lots of good points being made and taken. However I would like
Time is always an important issue, and a lack of it may cause
curtness. It'd be nice if everyone
As promised on IRC, my suggestions for the registry. Originally sent to
the maintainer of the registry.
Original Message
Subject: Some suggestions for the plug-in registry
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 22:13:58 +0200
From: Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'd like to propose
On 8/26/05, Michael Schumacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As promised on IRC, my suggestions for the registry. Originally sent to
the maintainer of the registry.
Sounds awesome.
1. Make it possible to indicate that a plug-in requires GIMP 2.2
2.3, and 2.4 options would be nice here too, I
Hi,
michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Make it possible to indicate that a plug-in requires GIMP 2.2
2.3, and 2.4 options would be nice here too, I suppose. And also,
change the list of links of types to a drop down box, maybe? (Dunno.)
2.3 is a development version with no API
On 8/26/05, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. Make it possible to indicate that a plug-in requires GIMP 2.2
2.3, and 2.4 options would be nice here too, I suppose. And also,
change the list of links of types to a drop down box,
Hi,
Nathan Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2.3 is a development version with no API guarantees whatsoever. The
API is constantly changing and noone should be developing any
plug-ins for it.
If you have such a closed Gimp Club attitude, why make developer
releases at all? After all, all
