[Gimp-developer] 1.2.1 crashes on indexed colour conversion

2001-06-06 Thread Avi Bercovich


Hi All,

As ever I;m not quite sure where I go to post bug reports, so I;m
posting to the list.

Colour conversion of the xcf file at
http://avi.mediamatic.nl/misc/conversion.html brings downs 1.2.1
everytime I attempt it ;-)

I'm trying to go from 24bit to 32 colours. if I resize the image from
2500x3500 to 2000x2800 it does work.

ttfn,

avi
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2.1 crashes on indexed colour conversion

2001-06-06 Thread Sven Neumann

Hi,

Avi Bercovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 As ever I;m not quite sure where I go to post bug reports, so I;m
 posting to the list.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ is the right place. Your bug-report has
been entered into the database and I have forwarded your mail to 
Adam asking him to have a look.

Argh, I knew the heavy usage of g_assert() in the convert code would
bite us some day.


Salut, Sven
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2.1 crashes on indexed colour conversion

2001-06-06 Thread Nick Lamb

On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
 Argh, I knew the heavy usage of g_assert() in the convert code would
 bite us some day.

But assuming the assertions aren't invalid we have found a bug that
would otherwise be very hard to find?
IIRC People who don't care why their applications crash can turn off
assertions, though presumably only at compile time.

Nick.
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer



Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2.1 crashes on indexed colour conversion

2001-06-06 Thread Adam D. Moss

Nick Lamb wrote:
 
 On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 07:37:23PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
  Argh, I knew the heavy usage of g_assert() in the convert code would
  bite us some day.
 
 But assuming the assertions aren't invalid we have found a bug that
 would otherwise be very hard to find?

Yes, the assertions caught a real bug (indeed for what other reason
would they be there?).

However, the bug has been long-dead in my current tree (but
possibly replaced with others, of course)!

--Adam
-- 
Adam D. Moss. ,,^^[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.foxbox.org/   co:3

i l1x0r u!  5luRp!Gronda, gronda
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer