On 12/13/06, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> Howdy folks,
> as the release approaches, I'd like to propose a default splash screen
> for 2.4. It's 99.9% work of Paul Davey of Gant* fame. It's both polished
> and not super-serious at the same time.
So, no contest this time? :)
Alexandre
___
On 12/14/06, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 17:21 -0600, Clarence Risher wrote:
> > Seems like tradition, every splash I can remember except 1.0 had a
> > version number. The wording on the rules doesnt require it, but it
> > seems to suggest it in more than one wa
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 15:01, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> Howdy folks,
> as the release approaches, I'd like to propose a default splash screen
> for 2.4. It's 99.9% work of Paul Davey of Gant* fame. It's both polished
> and not super-serious at the same time.
>
> http://jimmac.musichall.cz/stuff
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 14:47 -0600, Clarence Risher wrote:
> Are we intentionally not having the version number in the art?
Why should it be there? See http://wiki.gimp.org/gimp/GimpSplashScreen
for rules for splash screens.
Sven
___
Gimp-develop
Are we intentionally not having the version number in the art?
On 12/13/06, Jakub Steiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy folks,
> as the release approaches, I'd like to propose a default splash screen
> for 2.4. It's 99.9% work of Paul Davey of Gant* fame. It's both polished
> and not super-se
Howdy folks,
as the release approaches, I'd like to propose a default splash screen
for 2.4. It's 99.9% work of Paul Davey of Gant* fame. It's both polished
and not super-serious at the same time.
http://jimmac.musichall.cz/stuff/splash-mockup.png
http://jimmac.musichall.cz/stuff/gimp-2.4polished
