Hi Michael,
You might want to have a look at XNest, or the following GIMP plug-in if
you are working on Win32: http://registry.gimp.org/plugin?id=3892
I don't know if there is an equivalent for Mac OS X, though.
Thanks for the link. This is great, it's got a lot of what I was
interested in. If
Hi,
J. Grant wrote:
Hi, I wonder if there is any way I can donate money towards development
of a specific feature addition in GIMP?
We are currently working out two things which may be of interest - first, we are
working to have a way to make tax deductible donations to the GIMP via another
Hi Sven,
IMHO, the plugins could be left un-bound to any window as they are atm.
Or is there a hard coded underlying attachment between the plugin and
parent windows required for it all to work?
Are you saying that plug-in dialogs should be handled differently than
core dialogs? If we want to
On 05/02/2004 02:01:37 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
(3) the windows that are below it are not hidden by the application
But that's _the_ major advantage of the current user interface. It
allows you to easily use GIMP together with other applications such
as web browser and file managers.
That's
Hi,
Pedro Gimeno Fortea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Making them transient for the application window would be enough; it's
not necessary for them to be inside the app window. Only windows which
are permanent need to be: image windows, docks and such. However I
don't know if a window in a
Another argument is that we would certainly not want to drop the
current user interface since it works well for a lot of people. So
I seriously doubt that any user would object against having WiW in the
preferences.
That's not my point. But adding WiW to the GIMP code will almost
certainly
Hi,
J. Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another argument is that we would certainly not want to drop the
current user interface since it works well for a lot of people. So
I seriously doubt that any user would object against having WiW in
the preferences.
That's not my point. But
On 1 May 2004, at 11:02, J. Grant wrote:
I wonder if there is any way I can donate money towards
development of a specific feature addition in GIMP?
Hello J.,
I guess there are two ways:
1) Unconditionally donate money to the group. This may buy you
goodwill, and it will enable GIMP
J. Grant wrote:
Hi Branko,
Thanks for your reply.
While I love the flexibility the separate windows of the GIMP software
provide. A friend and I think it would be very useful to have a single
window styled layout (as well as the present flexible window position
interface), where all GIMP child
Hi Branko,
Thanks for your reply.
While I love the flexibility the separate windows of the GIMP software
provide. A friend and I think it would be very useful to have a single
window styled layout (as well as the present flexible window position
interface), where all GIMP child windows are
On 1 May 2004, at 13:51, J. Grant wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
Could you please cut my reply from yours if there are no specific
points of my reply that you are addressing? It saves unnecessary
scrolling on my part.
While I love the flexibility the separate windows of the GIMP software
Hi,
Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The consensus so far seems to be that the developers don't want to
touch such a feature. It's hard to find the real arguments against
the feature through the forest of emotional arguments that the
discussion has produced so far, but it seems
On 05/01/2004 07:16:32 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
There are a couple of good arguments against this feature.
Basically it is agreed that WiW is a bad concept that is being
dropped by all major software companies nowadays. It was only ever
introduced to work around the problem that some
Hi,
Pedro Gimeno Fortea [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(3) the windows that are below it are not hidden by the application
But that's _the_ major advantage of the current user interface. It
allows you to easily use GIMP together with other applications such as
web browser and file managers.
14 matches
Mail list logo
