Hi,
On Fri, 2007-01-19 at 21:23 -0300, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
PD: I know this kind of discussion may bother developers, and I
understand you are leading to a major release for us all. So, why not
open a mailing list dedicated to gimp-scripting? I ask questions about
scripting in the
2007/1/18, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:57:30AM -0300, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
I've had a similar idea than yours, and implemented it right away. But
instead of changing zones with keystrokes, the zone can be selected
using the crosspoint of two perpendicular
I've had a similar idea than yours, and implemented it right away. But
instead of changing zones with keystrokes, the zone can be selected
using the crosspoint of two perpendicular guides. I know this is ugly,
and maybe your idea about changing to next/previous zone is better.
Here it is:
I've had a similar idea than yours, and implemented it right away. But
instead of changing zones with keystrokes, the zone can be selected
using the crosspoint of two perpendicular guides. I know this is ugly,
and maybe your idea about changing to next/previous zone is better.
Here it is:
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 02:57:30AM -0300, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
I've had a similar idea than yours, and implemented it right away. But
instead of changing zones with keystrokes, the zone can be selected
using the crosspoint of two perpendicular guides. I know this is ugly,
and maybe your idea
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 08:04:28PM +1030, David Gowers wrote:
I like the idea of using a layer and a palette to draw the zones.
Even though I talked about hard edges, I (and everyone else drawing)
need anti-aliased ones in almost all cases :}
Well, the simple case of that is easily done
On 1/18/07, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I usually work with a bunch of alpha-locked layers (paint shape in
flat-colour,
lock alpha, paint shadows, light, texture ...)
I guess the perfect zone implementation would actualy need some overlap
to have the same effect of alpha-locked
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:10 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86274
If I understand the whole thread, it's about another way
to select any layer, not only one that has highest z-order
and non-zero alpha at a specific location (pointer).
No,
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 08:52:48AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
I start to realize what you are asking for now. But, instead of
suggesting a solution, could you perhaps try to explain where the
problems are when you try to use the currently available features to
implement your workflow? You
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 01:18:35AM -0800, Saul Goode wrote:
If I am understanding you correctly, these scripts should be helpful to
you in your workflow. You would still have to manually invert the
selection; but I would point out that the Select menu can torn off so
that Select-Invert is
Sorry, no. I don't see the benefit over switching between layers.
#1: A selection does not overlap its inverse.
#2: There is no need to keep track of which layers are associated with
each other (and for switching between layers, presumably they would
need to be adjacent in the layerstack).
#3:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:00:00 +0100, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 06:36:27AM -0800, Saul Goode wrote:
If the only difference is whether a mouse-click is used on the canvas or
a keystroke/menu/widget action is used to invert the selection, I
suspect you
On 1/18/07, Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok - I've read the request and got the idea.
I have the followwing proposal:
what if one had a set of pre-loaded selections, and could switch back
and forth among then with a single keystroke - Do you (and others)
think it could
On 1/18/07, Manuel Quiñones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've had a similar idea than yours, and implemented it right away. But
instead of changing zones with keystrokes, the zone can be selected
using the crosspoint of two perpendicular guides. I know this is ugly,
and maybe your idea about
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 18:03 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
Thinking some more about this, a switch to highest in the stack
layer with non-zero alpha at pointer location, option, triggered
on button/pen-down before drawing is actually executed could
do the trick while been least
On 1/17/07, Thorsten Wilms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
So I was asked to suggest new features on the mailing-list and only
file bug report after they have been discussed there ... and it seems
theres a misunderstanding to be resolved and i wouldn't mind more
exposure for this ... :)
My
Also consider reopening the bug report -- you can do this since you're the
reporter, and as Sven resolved it WONTFIX under a huge misapprehension of
it, I recommend doing so. It may influence the volume of discussion on it
here.
___
Gimp-developer
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 12:19 +1030, David Gowers wrote:
Also consider reopening the bug report -- you can do this since you're
the reporter, and as Sven resolved it WONTFIX under a huge
misapprehension of it, I recommend doing so. It may influence the
volume of discussion on it here.
Him
On Tue, 2007-01-16 at 22:06 +0100, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
My proposal is about an alternative to using either layers
or saved selections to draw on areas of an image with sharp
edges between them.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=80388
Shows a typical case, ignoring the
19 matches
Mail list logo
