yahvuu wrote:
Graeme Gill wrote:
The bottom line is that it depends on your purpose. If you
have a particular reason to specify device dependent colors,
then you deliberately don't want to tag the file with a profile.
This case worries me a bit. Hope you can enlighten me what the best
Graeme Gill wrote:
The bottom line is that it depends on your purpose. If you
have a particular reason to specify device dependent colors,
then you deliberately don't want to tag the file with a profile.
This case worries me a bit. Hope you can enlighten me what the best practices
are.
In a
On 03/13/2010 02:41 PM, yahvuu wrote:
Graeme Gill wrote:
The bottom line is that it depends on your purpose. If you
have a particular reason to specify device dependent colors,
then you deliberately don't want to tag the file with a profile.
This case worries me a bit. Hope you can enlighten
Omari Stephens wrote:
On 03/13/2010 02:41 PM, yahvuu wrote:
But how to avoid the overhead when such files are to be archieved?
After all, URLs tend to throw 404s after a while.
Just rely on the compression feature of the backup software?
I think the answer is easy: provide a way to strip
Hi,
On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 22:22 -0500, Jay Smith wrote:
... So what I want to understand is .
- In Gimp, I understand that an image without an embedded color space is
treated as if it had an embedded sRGB color space.
Not completely. It is assumed to be in sRGB. That
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 09:14 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
- And do the words embedding or assigning or tagging mean the same
thing in this context?
No, but that should have become evident already.
Let me try to define the terms nevertheless. Perhaps that helps to clear
up some of the
On 03/10/2010 02:37 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Some file formats, such as PNG for example, allow to tag the file to be
in a particular well-known color space. The color profile is not
embedded then, it is assumed to be well-defined. Instead of distributing
the profile with the image file, there
On 03/10/2010 09:40 AM, Jason Simanek wrote:
On 03/10/2010 02:37 AM, Sven Neumann wrote:
Some file formats, such as PNG for example, allow to tag the file to be
in a particular well-known color space. The color profile is not
embedded then, it is assumed to be well-defined. Instead of
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Jay Smith j...@jaysmith.com wrote:
You are going to hate this suggestion, but as long as certain browsers
are causing you a problem, you may have to do browser sniffing and
serve those users different content. In other words, different image
files get called
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Alexia Death alexiade...@gmail.com wrote:
Problem is not serving different content. Problem is making content
that works for those, and ultimately for all browsers. So your
suggestion misses the point. The point is need to create images that
are not color
Omari Stephens wrote:
Basically, lcms generates an RGB profile with the sRGB primaries,
transfer functions (aka gamma curve), and whitepoint; for the curious,
this happens in cmsCreate_sRGBProfile() in cmsvirt.c . For one, I'm not
sure if this is all there is to a real sRGB profile
Jay Smith wrote:
In various places (not necessarily in this thread) there is discussion
of embedding profiles and tagging with color space. It is NOT clear
to me if these are two phrases with the same meaning.
In general they are the same thing. Some people have schemes
to tag a file with a
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 16:36 +1100, Graeme Gill wrote:
[...]
Hmm. I'm not sure that 3k for an image is really that significant
given the bloat and slowdown on typical websites
Some people (including me) go to quite a bit of trouble to make the
initial Web page load as quickly as possible. It
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 08:52 +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Since the in-memory representation you get from cmsCreate_sRGBProfile()
has the same MD5 sum as an sRGB profile opened from disk, it appears
that it should be sufficient to use g_file_set_contents() to write it to
disk (if that is needed
Hi,
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 05:53 +, Omari Stephens wrote:
So, you're right; I had dismissed this possibility out-of-hand without
investigating sufficiently. Having poked around the lcms code a bit, I
don't think this option is feasible.
Basically, lcms generates an RGB profile with
Hi,
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 07:34 +, Omari Stephens wrote:
Finally, to respond to your question on the bug, we need some way to
embed an actual sRGB profile into an image.
Can't we just embed the lcms built-in sRGB profile? That sounds like a
totally straight-forward solution. But I might
Hi, all. I just finished v1 of the patch to add the sRGB ICCv2 profiles
to the GIMP distribution. They're 3kB each, so size shouldn't be an
issue. The main question is one of licensing. I believe the license
allows us to distribute the profiles, but IANAL.
I'd appreciate if someone who
Omari Stephens wrote:
Hi, all. I just finished v1 of the patch to add the sRGB ICCv2 profiles
to the GIMP distribution. They're 3kB each, so size shouldn't be an
issue. The main question is one of licensing. I believe the license
allows us to distribute the profiles, but IANAL.
As I
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 19:49 +, Omari Stephens wrote:
Hi, all. I just finished v1 of the patch to add the sRGB ICCv2 profiles
to the GIMP distribution. They're 3kB each, so size shouldn't be an
issue. The main question is one of licensing. I believe the license
allows us to
On 03/04/2010 09:01 PM, Sven Neumann wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 19:49 +, Omari Stephens wrote:
Hi, all. I just finished v1 of the patch to add the sRGB ICCv2 profiles
to the GIMP distribution. They're 3kB each, so size shouldn't be an
issue. The main question is one of licensing. I
20 matches
Mail list logo
