On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Should using an IWarp tool mean entering a separate "mode" where you
> then have to "apply and exit" it when done? That is somewhat ugly,
> isn't it?
That's how the Scissors tool works, so people are already used to it.
This way, a separate warp histor
On Saturday, July 31, 2010 22:33:56 Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> I think an IWarp tool would require mechanisms in GIMP that don't
> exist yet as none of the current tools, even if superficially similar
> (like the smudge tool) requires them.
Doing the iWarp tool in paint tool way was rejected because it
I think an IWarp tool would require mechanisms in GIMP that don't
exist yet as none of the current tools, even if superficially similar
(like the smudge tool) requires them. Also, the exact way an IWarp
tool should behave should be specified before one starts coding on
it;) Yeah, getting input on h
Pluggable tools would be nice, but the tool system is already set up to make
it
easy to add new ones. It's one of the easiest places in the gimp code for a
new
developer to work, although it would be a lot easier if there were more
developer
documentation. The problem with the iwarp tool wasn't i
On 7/31/10, Roland Lutz wrote:
> There has been repeatedly brought up the request for in-window
> applicability of the IWarp distort. Using IWarp in the preview pane is a
> nuisance and much inferior to, for example, the Photoshop Liquify tool.
> In fact, this has been the reason for me to consid
Hi Roland
On 07/31/2010 02:32 PM, Roland Lutz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there has been a discussion, in 2002-2004, to allow plugged-in tools.
>
> On 2002-02-22, Sven Neumann wrote:
>> not discussed, but already implemented ;-) The CVS version has
>> preliminary support for pluggable tools that can be eithe
Hi,
there has been a discussion, in 2002-2004, to allow plugged-in tools.
On 2002-02-22, Sven Neumann wrote:
> not discussed, but already implemented ;-) The CVS version has
> preliminary support for pluggable tools that can be either loaded as
> a plug-in (separate process) or as a module. I hav
