[Gimp-developer] Script-Fu error ... GUI shows different image selection than what script gets
I have a script-fu set up which has the following initialization: (script-fu-register script-fu-astro-rescale-for-web Toolbox/Xtns/Script-Fu/Astronomy/Scale for Web Rescale current image to \standard\ sizes for web display Roland B. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] Roland B. Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4 September 2002 SF-IMAGE Image 0 SF-VALUE Size List '(1600 1280 1024 800 640 320 160)) When the script is run by selecting it from the menu, an option list is presented which shows the current (and only, in this case) as selected. If I simply hit Okay, I get the following error: Script-Fu Error while executing (script-fu-astro-rescale-for-web 0 '(320)) ERROR: Procedural database executinog failed: (gimp_image_width 0) The problem is that my image is *not* image 0. It is image 5. I realize I have 0 as a default and most of the time that will probably make sense. But why is it showing me image 5 in the option list and then not using it. If I click on the option list and select the only image showing, it works correctly. Also, I tried evaluating (gimp-image-list) in the Script-Fu console and there really is only one image; i.e., I don't have any invisible ones hanging around. roland -- PGP Key ID: 66 BC 3B CD Roland B. Roberts, PhD RL Enterprises [EMAIL PROTECTED] 76-15 113th Street, Apt 3B [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forest Hills, NY 11375 ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu error ... GUI shows different image selection than what script gets
Roland Roberts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I have a script-fu set up which has the following initialization: [... The default value of SF_IMAGE gets returned even if there is just one image open ...] The problem is that my image is *not* image 0. It is image 5. I realize I have 0 as a default and most of the time that will probably make sense. But why is it showing me image 5 in the option list and then not using it. If I click on the option list and select the only image showing, it works correctly. I can reproduce this behaviour and I think it is a bug. If the user sees the entry to be correct he is likely to not click on the image-option menu. However, the GUI will happily pass the default value to the script. To work around this: You could use an invalid image ID (for example -1) as the default value. So you can easily check if this is a real image ID or the default value. You could for example query (gimp-images-list) for the ID of the image. But I think this behaviour should be fixed. Another suggestion: You use SF_VALUE for the size of your images. It most probably would be better to use SF-OPTION Size List '(1600 1280 1024 ...)) you then get an integer 0,1,2 indicating the selected option. This could be translated to the intended value by (nth index '(1600 1280 1024 ...)). I will file a bugreport for the other issue. Bye, Simon -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.home.unix-ag.org/simon/ ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu error ... GUI shows different image selection than what script gets
Simon == Simon Budig [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Simon [...] There is no real concept of a active image. This is Simon the primary reason, why there is no save entry in the Simon toolbox menu. Simon If you register your script in the context menu of the Simon image (Image) you always get the image/drawable the user Simon operates on as the first parameter. Thanks. This makes sense and, in fact, it really makes more sense to put my script in either the image or file context menu since I want it to both rescale and save the results. roland -- PGP Key ID: 66 BC 3B CD Roland B. Roberts, PhD RL Enterprises [EMAIL PROTECTED] 76-15 113th Street, Apt 3B [EMAIL PROTECTED] Forest Hills, NY 11375 ___ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
