On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 01:40:17PM +1000, Owen wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:41:20 -0400
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > maybe we can jump it up to 2 simply because everyone seems to be
> > involved again :)
>
> Follow Mr Knuth's technique
> Call this one 1.4 which would be foll
I say we just use 2.0 for the first stable tree using GEGL. This entire
argument sucks, imho. The first stable tree using GEGL has been called 2.0 for
so long, why call it anything else now?
It isnt about GTK2, or about Gnome2, or about any thing else. Its just what
someone started calling it, and
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:41:20 -0400
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maybe we can jump it up to 2 simply because everyone seems to be
> involved again :)
Follow Mr Knuth's technique
Call this one 1.4 which would be followed by
1.41 then
1.414 ... 1.4142136 ad infinitum
This has the advan
i use debian. debian seems to use what ever freaking version number
they would like to. lets talk about that instead.
maybe we can jump it up to 2 simply because everyone seems to be
involved again :)
carol
--
The sooner you fall behind, the more time you have to catch up.
__
