Disclaimer: This should really be addressed personally to egger, but after
writing this I thought that I should post it for general consumption
anyway. If you are easily offended, or if you think that SuSe "rulez", or
if you think that you are a "31337 g1mp h4x0r" then you shouldn't read
the rest
i would like to request that timecop be banned from this list.
is that possible? if so, would someone please do that? he obviously
fails to appreciate the quality program the developers have made
available to us and his constant cursing and complaining is a waste of
band width.
thank you.
bex
since I can't see your email address thanks to egoups, I can't reply
directly. But thanks for providing a patch.
tc
--
$B!&!E!D(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,(,!D!E!&(B
timecop at japan.co.jp | $B#O#ADL?.%5%S!<%93t<02q
LOL! I'm starting to love this guy :).
As an interesting side note, you (tc) may be surprised to
know that your 1.1.32-1.2.0 patch was created and hosted on
a SuSE 6.4 box (namely my own).
Sweet irony :)
Lourens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
Disclaimer: This should really be addressed
dissenting opinion is usually best left to wander off of its own lack of
purpose. and he hasn't posted anything bad in a couple of weeks whats the
problem? i figured it was just pre-finals stress.
it's been my experience that last year's whining screaming can quite often
be next years'
it's been my experience that last year's whining
screaming can quite often
be next years' thoughtful contribution. he
definitely cares about the
design, enough to get upset and scream about it.
maybe he has to learn
some things, but if you want a nice quiet list full
of nice quiet
Go Away
--
/--\ /--\
| Tal Danzig [EMAIL PROTECTED] |--| Linux by Libranet|
| Homepage:|--| The TOP Desktop |
| http://awpti.org/~tal|--| http://www.libranet.com |
Rebecca J. Walter said:
i would like to request that timecop be banned from this list. is that
possible? if so, would someone please do that? he obviously fails to
appreciate the quality program the developers have made available to
us and his constant cursing and complaining is a waste of
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:12:28AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Albert Chin-A-Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On IRIX 6.2 and 6.5 with GIMP 1.2.0:
$ gimp
/opt/TWWfsw/gimp12/bin/gimp: Failed to load one of the brushes in the
brush pipe
Albert Chin-A-Young wrote:
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 01:12:28AM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
snipped...
Yes, the old format was braindead and while the new is still bad,
it does not suck that much. We tried to keep backward-compatibility
with the old format and this piece of code
Hi,
"Garry R. Osgood" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can successfully use pepper.gbr. File-Open loads it in just fine
and I can select the brush in File-Dialogs-Brushes.
FYI, I have no problems with Solaris 8/SPARC nor Tru64 UNIX 4.0D/5.0.
snipped...
Just this evening (GMT -5.00) I've
Albert Chin-A-Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While trying to run gimp 1.2.0 on Solaris 7/SPARC:
$ gimp
Gimp-WARNING **: Failed to open palette file
/home/china/.gimp-1.2/palettes/Bears: can't happen?
Gimp-WARNING **: Failed to open palette file
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 04:48:39AM +0100, Mårten Svantesson wrote:
While trying to run gimp 1.2.0 on Solaris 7/SPARC:
$ gimp
Gimp-WARNING **: Failed to open palette file
/home/china/.gimp-1.2/palettes/Bears: can't happen?
Gimp-WARNING **: Failed to open palette file
13 matches
Mail list logo
