On Monday, 5 Feb 2001, Jay Cox wrote:
Linear, Log, and sqrt are all common ways to scale histograms for display.
Perhaps we should make it an option in preferences (or in the histogram
display itself).
sqrt() - I haddn't thought of that. That sounds plausibly like what
Photoshop is using.
Linear, Log, and sqrt are all common ways to scale histograms for
display.
Perhaps we should make it an option in preferences (or in the histogram
display itself).
sqrt() - I haddn't thought of that. That sounds plausibly like what
Photoshop is using. I might have a play with that.
Austin Donnelly wrote:
On Sunday, 4 Feb 2001, Roel Schroeven wrote:
I noticed in the source code that the histogram widget uses a logarithmic
scaling. Is there a reason to do it that way, as Photoshop et al. seem to
use a linear scaling.
I just checked the CVS history; we've been
On Sunday, 4 Feb 2001, Roel Schroeven wrote:
I noticed in the source code that the histogram widget uses a logarithmic
scaling. Is there a reason to do it that way, as Photoshop et al. seem to
use a linear scaling.
I just checked the CVS history; we've been using a log y axis (ie
pixel
I noticed in the source code that the histogram widget uses a logarithmic
scaling. Is there a reason to do it that way, as Photoshop et al. seem to
use a linear scaling.
Sorry if this has been brought up before; I searched in the mailing list
archives, but didn't find anything on it.
