Greetings!
On Wed, 07 Jun 2000, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[quoting Austin Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I would be very unhappy if changing the layer opacity from 100% to 50%
would eat up a dozen or more undo-steps since each value_changed signal
from the slider triggers
On Wed, 07 Jun 2000, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[quoting Austin Donnelly [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I would be very unhappy if changing the layer opacity from 100% to 50%
would eat up a dozen or more undo-steps since each value_changed signal
from the slider triggers an undo which
Hi,
Anyone else want to comment at this stage? As a user, would _you_ get
confused when you hit undo and all that changes is (eg) the layer
opacity?
I would be very unhappy if changing the layer opacity from 100% to 50%
would eat up a dozen or more undo-steps since each value_changed signal
Hi,
I would be very unhappy if changing the layer opacity from 100% to 50%
would eat up a dozen or more undo-steps since each value_changed signal
from the slider triggers an undo which causes another undo-step fall
off the end of the undo queue.
Oh, sure - that's clearly a bad
On Wed, Jun 07, 2000 at 04:25:49PM +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
I still believe that it is a bad idea to waste undo steps for
operations that don't save any shadow tiles.
I agree. If I'm on a machine with limited resources and have the GIMP
set up for only, say, 8 levels of undo, I don't want to
