can you add this as a tip of the day then?
--- Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the rotate90 routines could need a little
> optimization, but to do so, we'd
> have to move them into the core (they are performed
> in a plug-in now). This
> will probably happen in the next deve
Hi,
the rotate90 routines could need a little optimization, but to do so, we'd
have to move them into the core (they are performed in a plug-in now). This
will probably happen in the next development cycle, but not before 1.2.
Salut, Sven
ok, one flip horizontal and one vertical.
--- Jon Winters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, pixel fairy wrote:
>
> > for rotate->180, why not just flip vertical? its
> much
> > faster
>
> They are two completely different things. Try each
> operation on some
> text.
>
> --
>
On Fri, 28 Apr 2000, pixel fairy wrote:
> for rotate->180, why not just flip vertical? its much
> faster
They are two completely different things. Try each operation on some
text.
--
Jon Winters http://www.obscurasite.com/
"Everybody loves the GIMP!"
http://www.gimp.org/
On Fri, Apr 28, 2000 at 05:35:28AM -0700, pixel fairy wrote:
> for rotate->180, why not just flip vertical? its much
> faster
1) Its not nececarilly faster
2) they're not the same
original:
###
# #
###
#
#
flip vertical:
#
#
###
# #
###
rotate 180:
#
#
###
# #
###
Ian
--
Ian
for rotate->180, why not just flip vertical? its much
faster
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online and get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
