Re: Submitting Patches

2001-01-08 Thread Austin Donnelly

On , 8 Jan 2001, Sven Neumann wrote:

 A short patch like this one can always be sent through this list.
 But I'd prefer if you could redo the patch, because of the following
 reasons:
 
 - it reverts a change in the preferences dialog. You obviously 
   didn't cvs update before creating the diff. 
 - it changes some autogenerated code (the files ending in _cmds.c).
   The changes have to performed in the directory tools/pdbgen/pdb
   on the .pdb files.
 
 You could help us by providing a new patch. Sent it to the list again
 or upload it to ftp.gimp.org.

It might be an idea to put info like this in the HACKING file, so we
don't need to keep repeating it.

Austin



RE: Submitting Patches

2001-01-08 Thread oliver


 A short patch like this one can always be sent through this list.
 But I'd prefer if you could redo the patch, because of the following
 reasons:

 - it reverts a change in the preferences dialog. You obviously
   didn't cvs update before creating the diff.

D'oh, my bad.

 - it changes some autogenerated code (the files ending in _cmds.c).
   The changes have to performed in the directory tools/pdbgen/pdb
   on the .pdb files.


It would be nice to have this written down somewhere, as someone mentioned.
Looking now I notice the little comment at the beginning of the files, but
other than that they don't look very generated.

 You could help us by providing a new patch. Sent it to the list again
 or upload it to ftp.gimp.org.


An updated version of the patch is attached. Let me know if all is well
this time.

Cheers,
~ol


 blending2.patch.gz


Re: Submitting Patches

2001-01-08 Thread Sven Neumann

Hi,

"oliver" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

   An updated version of the patch is attached. Let me know if all is well
 this time.

I have applied the patch to CVS. If you would have given us your full name,
I would also have been able to it to the ChangeLog...


Salut, Sven



RE: Submitting Patches

2001-01-07 Thread oliver


Previous diff was a bit broken. Sorry about the spam.

   I've hacked a few of photoshop's blending modes (dodge 
 and burn -- which
 are different in photoshop than multiply and divide -- and 
 hardlight) into
 the gimp 1.3 sources. I was wondering if this would make an 
 interesting
 patch, and if so how do you guys prefer recieving them?

~ol
 blending.patch.gz


Re: Submitting Patches

2001-01-07 Thread Sven Neumann

Hi,

"oliver" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

   I've hacked a few of photoshop's blending modes (dodge and burn -- which
 are different in photoshop than multiply and divide -- and hardlight) into
 the gimp 1.3 sources. I was wondering if this would make an interesting
 patch, and if so how do you guys prefer recieving them?
 
   In any event a unified diff against current CVS is attached.

A short patch like this one can always be sent through this list.
But I'd prefer if you could redo the patch, because of the following
reasons:

- it reverts a change in the preferences dialog. You obviously 
  didn't cvs update before creating the diff. 
- it changes some autogenerated code (the files ending in _cmds.c).
  The changes have to performed in the directory tools/pdbgen/pdb
  on the .pdb files.

You could help us by providing a new patch. Sent it to the list again
or upload it to ftp.gimp.org.


Salut, Sven