On 13 Feb, Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
This can be dangerous; you can get a resizing loop if your code isn't
carefully written. Window managers can refuse to accept a client
resize request or can modify it, which could result in a duel between
GIMP and the window manager as the two fight over
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000 19:50:07 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hm, couldn't we use the event handling system to automatically resize
the toolbox to a new good value on every resize event:
If you enlarge the toolbox the window size automatically snaps on the
next convenient size and vice
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 14:21:39 -0500 (EST), Glyph Lefkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Rather than doing this, wouldn't it be possible to do the same thing
that terminals do, I.E. make the window resizable by char cells
rather than pixels? I like the fact that I can resize the window as
I work,
One suggestion would be to not have the toolbox user-resizeable via the
window manager at all, but to have in the Preferences a setting where
you use a spinbutton to set the number of columns. If you start from,
say, three columns, and keep increasing the number, at the point where
the number of
Here is an interesting experiment for those who do not understand
what the problem is with the "Help" item in the toolbox:
- start Gimp
- resize the toolbox so that all tools are on a single column
(approx. 30 x 750 pixels)
- try to open a new image, or to do anything useful
The problem is
Here is an interesting experiment for those who do not understand
what the problem is with the "Help" item in the toolbox:
- start Gimp
- resize the toolbox so that all tools are on a single column
(approx. 30 x 750 pixels)
- try to open a new image, or to do anything useful
about
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, "Daniele Medri" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
about Toolbox resizeble.
Flexibility is ok.. but some time create problems.
Why don't set fixed sizes x*y to cover all the dimension of toolbar?
This could be usefull to have right dimension and good rappresentation.
I'll try your technique but shouldn't the toolbox be coded so that all
parts are visible all the time?
End users are going to be frightned if they resize the toolbox using the
corner of the window like they would with anything else and parts start
dissappearing.
To make matters worse, I messed
On Sat, 12 Feb 2000, Jon Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
^
You seem to have a problem with the date on your computer. :-)
I've had problems with the toolbox ever since it became re-sizable. I can
size it exactly the way I want it, three vertical rows of tools with
I've had problems with the toolbox ever since it became re-sizable. I can
size it exactly the way I want it, three vertical rows of tools with
colors, brushes, patterns, and gradients below but the brushes, patterns,
and gradients are always pushed outside the window, invisible and
On 10 Feb, Raphael Quinet wrote:
Flexibility is ok.. but some time create problems.
Why don't set fixed sizes x*y to cover all the dimension of toolbar?
This could be usefull to have right dimension and good
rappresentation.
Unfortunately, this is not so simple. Constraining the
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 10:29:56AM -0500, Zach Beane - MINT wrote:
On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 10:09:42AM -0600, Jon Winters wrote:
I've had problems with the toolbox ever since it became re-sizable. I can
size it exactly the way I want it, three vertical rows of tools with
colors,
12 matches
Mail list logo
