cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 13:13:34 +0100
> Will we unmark printer names N_() tagging in print.c?
I'm not sure. I have done it once, but didn't check it in after I
realized that lots of translators had
From: SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 20:46:54 +0900
Will we unmark printer names N_() tagging in print.c?
I don't have any plans to touch this stuff in 3.0. 3.1 and 3.2 are
going to be somewhat different.
--
Robert Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http:
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 12:24:46 +0100
> I'm having to release a Print 3.0.6 due to a fairly serious bug found
> by Panos Katsaloulis. The specific bug is that monochrome printing in
> grayscale does not work properly.
> Will we unmark printer names N_() tagging in print.c?
I'm not sure. I have done it once, but didn't check it in after I
realized that lots of translators had already provided localisation
for those strings. I don't know if an "EPSON Stylus Color" is called
like this all over the world, so ther
Hi,
Will we unmark printer names N_() tagging in print.c?
--
SHIRASAKI Yasuhiro : Experimental Particle Physics, JLC Team
Graduate School of Science, TOHOKU University 980-8578 Japan.
Hi,
> I'm having to release a Print 3.0.6 due to a fairly serious bug found
> by Panos Katsaloulis. The specific bug is that monochrome printing in
> grayscale does not work properly. The patch is enclosed below.
I have applied your patch. Additionally I have changed the code so that
the "File
I'm having to release a Print 3.0.6 due to a fairly serious bug found
by Panos Katsaloulis. The specific bug is that monochrome printing in
grayscale does not work properly. The patch is enclosed below.
cvs diff: Diffing .
Index: README
==
