On 4 Oct, Zach Beane - MINT wrote:
> The buttons now "flow", so you can have a horizontally oriented
> toolbox or a vertical one, or something in between with a square
> toolbox. It's easier to have a different layout than the default now.
Not that long ago I had a nice idea about the toolbox.
On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 12:47:41PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 3 Oct, Zach Beane - MINT wrote:
>
> > Yosh is still working on this, and when he is done it will Do It
> > Exactly Right. Well, perhaps not that good, but certainly better than
> > its current in-development state.
>
> I j
On 3 Oct, Zach Beane - MINT wrote:
> Yosh is still working on this, and when he is done it will Do It
> Exactly Right. Well, perhaps not that good, but certainly better than
> its current in-development state.
I just wonder what the reason was for changing the old behaviour?
--
Servus,
2 AM
Subject: Strange toolbox behaviour
>Hiho!
>
> Is it the intended behaviour that the toolbar can be resized by the
> user at will? If the user makes it too small the icons will mix up and
> if the user makes it to large in its height the colorbox and the
> brush/pattern/gradi
On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 04:59:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hiho!
>
> Is it the intended behaviour that the toolbar can be resized by the
> user at will? If the user makes it too small the icons will mix up and
> if the user makes it to large in its height the colorbox and the
> brus
Hiho!
Is it the intended behaviour that the toolbar can be resized by the
user at will? If the user makes it too small the icons will mix up and
if the user makes it to large in its height the colorbox and the
brush/pattern/gradient will be drawn somewhere in Nirvana.
The former behaviour