I can still reproduce this on latest master
(5835a730a3eef3cee579c50b250bb8ba15b77d7c), using the images that are
available for download at the bottom of that page.
Strangely, if you open the 16 bit tiff, and choose not to convert it
into the sRGB builtin colorspace, the image still displays with
Liam wrote:
I don't think you should view it as written in stone
no, you just have to take it up with your own, personal Moses™ ;^}
work on the unified geometry tool has been kicked into another gear
this week. Mikael and I are discussing different aspects and
the spec is taking strides again.
On 6/19/12, Øyvind Kolås pip...@gimp.org wrote:
None of the ICC profile handling in GIMP deals with GEGL or higher
bitdepths - at the start and end of all these code paths things go
through 8bpc; and probably behave similarly to how they do in 2.8 -
there shouldn't be much of a difference.
Hello
I've noticed that the the problem with Save/Export is calming down ( I
guess till the Ubuntu users get their hands on GIMP 2.8, and start whining
), so I want to start a new issue, and I hope it will be a constructive
discussion.
Now what I was wondering was: is there a real need for
Hi, /Øyvind and Mitch,
If you join #gimp on irc.gimp.org I'm sure there will be people who
can point you in the right direction ;) At least for the color profile
bits which should be very self contained code.
I will follow your suggestions to join IRC, #gimp on irc.gimp.org.
On 6/19/12, Ursu Dumitru dimaurs...@gmail.com wrote:
Now what I was wondering was: is there a real need for having both these
things: canvas and layer? Aren't they pretty much the same thing?
Perhaps we are talking about two different things. But I use canvas
(Image - Canvas size) all the
On 19.06.2012 20:17, Ursu Dumitru wrote:
Now what I was wondering was: is there a real need for having both these
things: canvas and layer? Aren't they pretty much the same thing?
In an image, you have multiple layers. Or layers that are larger than
the canvas, or smaller, ...
I don't
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 21:17 +0300, Ursu Dumitru wrote:
Now what I was wondering was: is there a real need for having both these
things: canvas and layer? Aren't they pretty much the same thing?
The canvas is a sort of layer that contains other layers, such that the
inner layers are clipped to
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Guillermo Espertino (Gez) wrote:
Personally I don't see any reason to revisit these concepts.
Even if, unlike Mypaint and Krita, GIMP doesn't have the notion of
background patterns? :)
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org
On 06/19/2012 06:36 PM, peter sikking wrote:
Liam wrote:
I don't think you should view it as written in stone
no, you just have to take it up with your own, personal Moses™ ;^}
work on the unified geometry tool has been kicked into another gear
this week. Mikael and I are discussing
Am 17.06.2012 23:29, schrieb peter sikking:
you are on a roll with brainstorming, aren’t you?
taking that a bit further, that would be ‘export + force close’
or ‘overwrite and force close’.
the combinations; the integration in the file menu; and
the edge case-ness all give me stomach
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 21:59 +0200, yahvuu wrote:
A pop-up is certainly appropriate for preventing _accidental_ data loss via
Close.
But for Force Close, i see no justification to interrupt the train of thought
by
raising a pop-up.
Years ago I used a mailer called elm, in which x was the
Simon Budig wrote:
This discussion really boils down to a matter of taste and there are
arguments for both ways. Unfortunately in your case you're taste weighs
less than the taste of Peter to the developers.
If it was purely taste, I wouldn't bother commenting.
It's a lack of logic though -
peter sikking wrote:
- this means that either all users would have to have intimate
knowledge of file formats to know why the option to save to them
disappear as edits are done (usability blooper. bit of alpha is
introduced? no more jpeg; any layers? no more png; paths and
layers? tiff is
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 09:32:36AM +1000, Graeme Gill wrote:
peter sikking wrote:
- this means that either all users would have to have intimate
knowledge of file formats to know why the option to save to them
disappear as edits are done (usability blooper. bit of alpha is
introduced?
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Marco Ciampa wrote:
Or you get the computer to do the hard work, and indicate what
of the current image state would get dropped if forced to saved
to that format.
Peter: am I wrong if I say that, with the newer versions of GIMP, due to
the final integration
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 01:46 +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
[...] am I wrong if I say that, with the newer versions of GIMP, due to
the final integration with GEGL, saving png to png or jpg to jpg has
even less sense, since GIMP inerently import into an internal
rappresentation that is no more
17 matches
Mail list logo
