One thing I noticed is that actually loading the images is very expensive,
and gimp doesn't behave very well while it's happening. It took several
minutes to load the large image, and while it was doing it, X was mostly
unresponsive. Is there room for improvement here?
Same effect under
Aaron Paden aaronbpaden at gmail.com writes:
So I mostly use MyPaint, but I'd like to be able to do some things in
gimp, too. But gimp is way too slow on this computer. Especially trying
to open large images like MyPaint encourages, I'll have to run to
another tty to try and kill the
Hello Michael, Aaron,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 06:34:29 + (UTC) Michael Grosberg
grosberg.mich...@gmail.com wrote:
Aaron Paden aaronbpaden at gmail.com writes:
So I mostly use MyPaint, but I'd like to be able to do some things in
gimp, too. But gimp is way too slow on this computer.
On 07/19/2012 02:28 AM, wwp wrote:
even though when attempting to process image/data files
that are, say, modern. The OP didn't mention precisely how big they
are (trying to open large images like MyPaint encourages), but I
presume they are way bigger than image sizes that were conventional in
Aaron,
The problem anyway is with the right GIMP version - not strict related
to the computer power
I have 2 computers
first - 32bit architecture, Intel Quad core with 4 Gb RAM + 1Gb RAM
ATI RADEON HD
second - 64bit architecture with 8 processing cores with 8 Gb RAM +
1Gb RAM Nvidia video card
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 00:35 -0500, Aaron Paden wrote:
Hello, Liam. I've tried your suggestions and have gotten some pretty
good results.
good!
One thing I noticed is that actually loading the images is very
expensive, and gimp doesn't behave very well while it's happening. It
took
Elle, I am not a programmer but I am a color professional. so here is
my input regarding your last question:
It seems to me that you will always need ICC profiles, to convert an
image from whatever ICC color space profile it happens to be in, to
your internal working space, and from your
