On 07/29/12 02:11, Malix wrote:
I already know that this post will generate a lot of flames. Next step
of the project is the porting of the code to Gtk 3, why instead not
switching away from gtk and go with Qt? And also leave autohell and
switch to make?
You can think that I'm just kidding but
Hi Peter,
I didn't mean to imply it is a fully controlled, scientifically valid
study. So let's call it an experiment. Just a single data point. As such
it doesn't prove anything. But it can be the beginning of more solid
work. Maybe in our community, others are willing to contribute more
Hi,
did you compile manually babl (and gegl) before compiling gimp? That's
the best way to build the whole 'gimp environment' cause you get not
only fresh gimp but also its crucial dependencies.
Yes, I've compiled them myself. Both of them were taken from the git
repository directly.I also
Hi all,
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 04:44:21 +0400
Alexandre Prokoudine alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 4:11 AM, Malix wrote:
I already know that this post will generate a lot of flames.
But you do it anyway?
Next step of the project is the porting of the code
Hi Shlomi
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 01:21:03PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
In any case, I would be willing to work on porting GIMP's build system to
CMake, as long as there is a general agreement from GIMP's developers that
CMake will be available in addition or instead of GNU Autotools (so I
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Mukund Sivaraman m...@banu.com wrote:
Hi Shlomi
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 01:21:03PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
In any case, I would be willing to work on porting GIMP's build system to
CMake, as long as there is a general agreement from GIMP's developers that
Hi Partha,
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 07:22:35 -0400
Partha Bagchi parth...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Mukund Sivaraman m...@banu.com wrote:
Hi Shlomi
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 01:21:03PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
In any case, I would be willing to work on porting GIMP's
Hi Mukund,
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 16:39:19 +0530
Mukund Sivaraman m...@banu.com wrote:
Hi Shlomi
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 01:21:03PM +0300, Shlomi Fish wrote:
In any case, I would be willing to work on porting GIMP's build system to
CMake, as long as there is a general agreement from GIMP's
Whatever distro you work on, the package manager won't notice your
installation if you made it by 'make install' in the project's source
code. The package manager will see only applications installed as
packages (eg deb on debian/ubuntu/mint or rpm on fefora/centos etc).
Now if you still see old
On Sunday, July 29, 2012, 13:55:48, Shlomi Fish wrote:
CMake can generate GNU make-compatible makefiles just fine, so unless you
meant
GNU Automake, that's not the issue. CMake can also generate project files for
other IDEs and support some other build-systems, all from the same sources, so
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Jernej Simončič jer...@ena.si wrote:
On Sunday, July 29, 2012, 13:55:48, Shlomi Fish wrote:
CMake can generate GNU make-compatible makefiles just fine, so unless you
meant
GNU Automake, that's not the issue. CMake can also generate project files for
other
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Partha Bagchi wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Jernej Simončič jer...@ena.si wrote:
On Sunday, July 29, 2012, 13:55:48, Shlomi Fish wrote:
CMake can generate GNU make-compatible makefiles just fine, so unless you meant
GNU Automake, that's not the issue. CMake can
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Boudewijn Rempt b...@valdyas.org wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Partha Bagchi wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Jernej Simončič jer...@ena.si wrote:
On Sunday, July 29, 2012, 13:55:48, Shlomi Fish wrote:
CMake can generate GNU make-compatible makefiles
Autotools may be unpleasant to learn, but once it works, it works, and it
works well for GIMP. If you were starting a new project then you might have
grounds to think about picking an easier build tool, but why throw away all
the work already put into GIMP's use of autotools because autotools is
On 12-07-29 06:47 AM, Guiu Rocafort wrote:
It seems like having made a compiling from git and an sudo make install
installed the new versions of babl and gegl, but the package manager
doesn't noticed that and still thinks i have the previous version
installed. Does that make sense ? Any idea of
On Saturday, July 28, 2012, 23:54:31, Guiu Rocafort wrote:
Any idea about what can be wrong ?
If you compiled babl yourself, it probably ended up in /usr/local/lib,
which is searched after /usr/lib - try running GIMP from terminal like
this:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib gimp-2.9
--
Jernej
On 12-07-29 06:21 AM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
In any case, I would be willing to work on porting GIMP's build system to
CMake, as long as there is a general agreement from GIMP's developers that
CMake will be available in addition or instead of GNU Autotools (so I won't
work for naught).
My one
17 matches
Mail list logo
