On Wednesday, August 1, 2012, 1:55:52, Jari Niskala wrote:
> Now to the question. I managed to build the 2.8.0 release from sources for
> Win32 (using MinGW) but I'm trying to figure out why my build is quite
> large, ~32MB, compared to the official Windows build coming in around 5MB.
> This is fo
FYI, the only configure flag I used was to disable python.
From: Jari Niskala [mailto:jarinisk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 4:20 PM
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Cc: 'Jari niskala'
Subject: Windows build
Hi guys,
First of all, thanks for all your hard work on such a g
This in an update for the build and packaging scripts for the osx port of
gimp.
- fixes for pango and font errors
- update atk, pango, and pixman packages
- enable the creation of python apps and the pyconsole
- update README
- other small fixes/typos
Here's the patch.
https://dl.d
I notice a touch of respect. I appreciate that. Isn't it much more fun
to deal with each other that way?
And yes, I did use the term usability study loosely. I thought that was
clear to the reader and not a damage to anyone. But if not, I apologize.
Am 30.07.2012 23:44, schrieb peter sikking:
Dear Sir/Madam,
My name is Carver Jian, I'm a technician of the Business Services & Development
Team of a telecommunications company in Macau named Companhia de
Telecommunicacoes de Macau(CTM). We have launched our Cloud Services in Mar
this year and we are now preparing to launch a VDI solutio
