On Fri, 2013-10-04 at 15:42 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> Because fake italics and bold faces are an abomination :)
That's true for Western typography with the Latin alphabet, in general,
although even there it does have uses, e.g. for display faces used in
light colours on a dark backgroun
Just trying out the Text Tool UI, re: font simulation.
There's a bit of a usability problem in 2.8.4 -- if you type text, remove
it, change the font-size & click in back in the box to type something else
-- your size setting is always rejected & reverted to the default (18px).
Sigetch is exactly
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
> >>B - Same of A. I think solving A maybe can solve this bug.
> >
> >Yeah.
>
> But solving A does not solve B and the old coloured icon still
> appears. ¿?¿?¿? :(
ok, weird.
> I have include the gtk-print to force CMYK color chooser to load the
> symbolic
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 12:57:00AM +1300, Jehan Pagès wrote:
[...]
> I would personally not be against a feature request along this line.
> Giving the right feedback to users, and making them informed and
> active rather than passive in their choices, is totally my view of
> things.
> If you write
On 10/04/2013 09:01 PM, Guillermo Espertino (Gez) wrote:
El 04/10/13 14:57, Matthew Smith escribió:
Hello
I am going to make an effort to get a layer multi-select going. In this
email I will outline what I hope to achieve and I am asking what would
be the most effective way to go about submitti
El 04/10/13 14:57, Matthew Smith escribió:
Hello
I am going to make an effort to get a layer multi-select going. In this
email I will outline what I hope to achieve and I am asking what would
be the most effective way to go about submitting a patch that could get
accepted.
IANAD ;) but wouldn'
Hello
I am going to make an effort to get a layer multi-select going. In this
email I will outline what I hope to achieve and I am asking what would
be the most effective way to go about submitting a patch that could get
accepted.
The goal is to be able to select multiple layers, and perform
El 04/10/13 14:37, Simon Budig escribió:
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
A - I have the symbolic icon, but I can find the widget name to load
the icon. Gimp allways loads this colorful icon and I can not change
it. ¿What name has it?
This is imported from the default gtk stock icons: "g
You should know the situation for the CJK (Chinese, Japanese, Korean) fonts.
There are more than 15,000 characters to be designed, so that little font
set has bold and italics face.
In those countries, the bug reported above is very serious and critical.
We have to have options to use simulated bo
El 04/10/13 05:12, Jehan Pagès escribió:
It was the reason of why italic/bold could not be simulated anymore in
2.8.6 for Windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708110
In my oppinion, that's not a bug, it's an improvement.:-)
Bold and Italics variants should be designed specifica
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
> A - I have the symbolic icon, but I can find the widget name to load
> the icon. Gimp allways loads this colorful icon and I can not change
> it. ¿What name has it?
This is imported from the default gtk stock icons: "gtk-select-color"
> B - Same of A. I th
El 04/10/13 13:59, Simon Budig escribió:
The bug D is almost done: eye icon has changed, bug when clicked,
>there are no "closed eye" showd, so, I need help to solve this.
I am not sure if I understand the bug: the default theme does not
contain a "closed eye" icon.
Do you see the default eye w
jEsuSdA 8) (lis...@jesusda.com) wrote:
> Working on gtkrc I have solved F bug and improve the icons visualization.
Thanks for your efforts, that indeed looks really great. I'm all for
including it in the main gimp source.
> The bug D is almost done: eye icon has changed, bug when clicked,
> there
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>
It was the reason of why italic/bold could not be simulated anymore in
2.8.6 for Windows.
>>>
>>> And I suggest we keep it that way. Committing crime against typograph
Here you can find the bugs :
http://www.pasteall.org/pic/show.php?id=60270
A - I have the symbolic icon, but I can find the widget name to load the
icon. Gimp allways loads this colorful icon and I can not change it.
¿What name has it?
There are no reference in libgimpwidgets documentation abo
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>>> It was the reason of why italic/bold could not be simulated anymore in
>>> 2.8.6 for Windows.
>>
>> And I suggest we keep it that way. Committing crime against typography
>> isn't going to make us popular among professionals.
>
> Well I person
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>
>> It was the reason of why italic/bold could not be simulated anymore in
>> 2.8.6 for Windows.
>
> And I suggest we keep it that way. Committing crime against typography
> isn
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
> It was the reason of why italic/bold could not be simulated anymore in
> 2.8.6 for Windows.
And I suggest we keep it that way. Committing crime against typography
isn't going to make us popular among professionals.
Alexandre
_
Hi!
Few days ago, I saw the Alexandre Prokoudine post on Google+ about Gimp
and Symbolic icon theme:
https://plus.google.com/104550365344856778857/posts/LP1pWr7YEgA
He said he downloaded the gimp source code and overwrite the main icons,
then he compiled.
This procedure is not very easy to
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
> On 10/04/2013 10:12 AM, Jehan Pagčs wrote:
>> Also we have a bunch of fixes in gimp-2-8 branch anyway, and it is
>> soon 4 months since 2.8.6. Maybe it is a good time to make a minor
>> release? I feel like there is no much reason to
Allessandro,
I am doubtful this has anything to do with 4.8.1 since I have been using
4.8.1 in building Gimp and recently including BIMP and have not seen any
issues.
Please feel free to contact me offlist to resolve this, if you wish.
Thanks,
Partha
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Alessandro
On 10/04/2013 10:12 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
Hi,
About the broken font support, which was simply in the end
fontconfig's configuration which kept some absolute path from the
Linux where it was cross-compiled from, I think it is a pretty broken
stuff.
It was the reason of why italic/bold could not
Hello everyone,
This morning, on my Windows platform, I’ve decided to run a “mingw-get.exe
upgrade” command in order to give a fresh update to my compiling tools.
The process finished fine and the GCC version changed from 4.7.2 to 4.8.1...
but I shouldn't have done it!
I went to my plugin s
Hi,
About the broken font support, which was simply in the end
fontconfig's configuration which kept some absolute path from the
Linux where it was cross-compiled from, I think it is a pretty broken
stuff.
It was the reason of why italic/bold could not be simulated anymore in
2.8.6 for Windows.
h
24 matches
Mail list logo
