On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Dominik Tabisz wrote:
> That's what chomikuj.pl state. Their first version was "complain of
> microsoft partner", after attempt to clarify that Gimp is GPL licenced
> ,chomikuj.pl directed to author of complaint: They got an abuse report
> from microsoft-noti...@ma
On 10.12.2013 01:38, Dominik Tabisz wrote:
> That's what chomikuj.pl state. Their first version was "complain of
> microsoft partner", after attempt to clarify that Gimp is GPL licenced
> ,chomikuj.pl directed to author of complaint: They got an abuse report
> from microsoft-noti...@marketly.com
>
Thank You for answer.
Version 2.4 was for backup purposes.
> How is this even remotely related to Microsoft?
>
> Alexandre
That's what chomikuj.pl state. Their first version was "complain of
microsoft partner", after attempt to clarify that Gimp is GPL licenced
,chomikuj.pl directed to author of
> On 09.12.2013 22:34, Dominik Tabisz wrote:
>
>> Gimp users in Poland have some strange problem: when we leave gimp
>> installation files on publicly accessible file sharing services - they
>> are removed because of "copyright laws".
>
>> I believe that Microsoft do not own any rights to Gimp, am
On 09.12.2013 22:34, Dominik Tabisz wrote:
> In our filesharing service "chomikuj.pl", gimp-2.4.2-i686-setup.exe
> was removed due to complain from Microsoft partner: Marketly.com
> This company claims that file gimp(...)setup.exe violates rights of
> microsoft corporation. It looks like bigger co
On 09.12.2013 22:34, Dominik Tabisz wrote:
> Gimp users in Poland have some strange problem: when we leave gimp
> installation files on publicly accessible file sharing services - they
> are removed because of "copyright laws".
> I believe that Microsoft do not own any rights to Gimp, am i wrong?
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:00 AM, Sam Gleske wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Sam Gleske wrote:
>
>> What are the Windows packagers using for the build? If they're using a
>> proprietary package system I suggest moving to a more open one such as NSIS
>> and customizing that. Window
Hello
Gimp users in Poland have some strange problem: when we leave gimp
installation files on publicly accessible file sharing services - they
are removed because of "copyright laws".
In our filesharing service "chomikuj.pl", gimp-2.4.2-i686-setup.exe
was removed due to complain from Microsoft p
Sam Gleske wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Sam Gleske
>wrote:
>Does this mean that nobody on this list knows what the release process
>is on Windows for building installers?
Innosetup is used for the installers, and the scripts for it are in the git
repository, under the build/windo
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Sam Gleske wrote:
> What are the Windows packagers using for the build? If they're using a
> proprietary package system I suggest moving to a more open one such as NSIS
> and customizing that. Windows builds can easily be automated using NSIS.
> Another advantag
> Am 09.12.2013 um 00:50 schrieb Jon Nordby :
>
> I'm pretty sure that you don't need a custom XCode install. The 10.6
> SDK comes with XCode for OSX 10.9 (or you can install it from inside
> XCode). You do need to set all the right flags though. I beliieve
> these are all, but I don't have a Ma
Hi Jehan,
I am happy to work both ways. As you will see on Google+ or Flickr, and
from the emails I receive, integrated plugins seems to be something that a
lot of folks prefer and easier for me as well. Hence, I would opt for Door
number 2, as long as there is no goat behind it :) (Sorry couldn't
12 matches
Mail list logo
