>On 31 December 2013 23:26, Ofnuts wrote:
>>it looks like many plugins won't work anymore and will need
>>seroius rework...
On 01/01/2014 03:10 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
>Which plugins do you expect not to work anymore, and why?
I'm sure this isn't what Ofnuts was talking about, but I've noticed
tha
Apologies for the OT post, but our Macintosh maintainer retired from the
Gutenprint project and we're looking for someone to take on the role.
Is there anyone here with the Mac chops who would be interested in doing
this for a couple of releases per year? Our previous Mac expert would
be willing t
On 01/01/2014 03:10 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
On 31 December 2013 23:26, Ofnuts wrote:
On 12/31/2013 06:36 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote:
Presumably how far are we to the new 2.10 gimp version?
How many blocking bugs are left and what are these?
thanks and happy GNU year...
Will it really be 2.10? Its
On Wed, 2014-01-01 at 15:27 +0100, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> On 01.01.2014 15:21, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
> >
> >> I believe files produced with 2.10 which _does not_ make use of
> >> 2.10-only features can be opened in 2.8. Correct me if
On 01.01.2014 15:21, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
>
>> I believe files produced with 2.10 which _does not_ make use of
>> 2.10-only features can be opened in 2.8. Correct me if I am wrong.
>> 2.10 will be able to open all 2.8 files, of course.
>
On Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Jon Nordby wrote:
> I believe files produced with 2.10 which _does not_ make use of
> 2.10-only features can be opened in 2.8. Correct me if I am wrong.
> 2.10 will be able to open all 2.8 files, of course.
If you try that, GIMP 2.8 will tell you it doesn't support
On 31 December 2013 23:26, Ofnuts wrote:
> On 12/31/2013 06:36 PM, Marco Ciampa wrote:
>>
>> Presumably how far are we to the new 2.10 gimp version?
>> How many blocking bugs are left and what are these?
>>
>> thanks and happy GNU year...
>
>
> Will it really be 2.10? Its internals are different,