As of lately,
new, sometimes simple, feature requests added to bugzilla are being
quickly closed as invalid, with a short-text inviting the reporter to
discuss the feature here (developer mailing list) rather than
entering then at bugzilla.
This here is an invitation for us to discuss this
On Sat, 2014-04-19 at 13:29 -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote:
[...]
Even if the text always contain looks a nice idea, let's talk about
it on the mailing list,
the invalid', if only for the status name means... invalid. It is
not a nice word to receive
as an evaluation for what one thinks is a
Introducing a new status feature requelst or potential future story
should be simple.
But I'd even suggest going one step forther: integrating with
bountysource or such. If people like a feature they might be sponsoring
it even ..
There is a big difference in suggesting a feature and having time
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 4:29 AM, Joao S. O. Bueno gwid...@gmail.com wrote:
As of lately,
new, sometimes simple, feature requests added to bugzilla are being
quickly closed as invalid, with a short-text inviting the reporter to
discuss the feature here (developer mailing list) rather than
Hi again,
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 6:03 AM, scl scl.gp...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
yes, it's a bit tricky.
One goal is to take care for bugs in a timely manner to
let the reporter know that we care as well as to
save developers from drowning in open bugs.
Thousands of bugs can stay open, that's
