Is is possible to access the position of the sample points from within a
script? I can't find any reference to them in the Procedure browser.
Kevin X
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:
On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 17:11 -0400, Elle Stone wrote:
On 03/08/2015 11:34 AM, Michael Natterer wrote:
So now we have some new code, in the playground, so that it will
be off by default in a stable release.
A somewhat off-topic question:
I have the n-point deformation and handle transform
On 03/08/2015 11:34 AM, Michael Natterer wrote:
So now we have some new code, in the playground, so that it will
be off by default in a stable release.
A somewhat off-topic question:
I have the n-point deformation and handle transform checked in the
playground and I restarted GIMP. But I
It would be straightforward to add that functionality, though. All that
would be needed is to add a function gimp_image_get_sample_points_invoker()
to app/pdb/image-cmds.c, which would call gimp_image_get_sample_points(),
and then glue it to a procedure called gimp-image-get-sample-points. That
On 08/03/15 09:42, Kevin Payne wrote:
Is is possible to access the position of the sample points from within
a script? I can't find any reference to them in the Procedure browser.
No way AFAIK. Scripts that require image coordinates usually ask the
user to draw a path and use the path
I wondered about that at the time, but the Path technique has several
advantages over the sample points:
* you are not limited to 4 points
* you can keep points and target layer in synch using the links
* you have sub-pixel accuracy
On 08/03/15 14:54, Bill Skaggs wrote:
It would be
On Fri, 2015-03-06 at 23:33 +0300, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
Hi,
Here's some first feedback regarding the newly added handle transform
tool. Pleas bear in mind that it's just my personal observations, I
could be dead wrong about something.
I see that the new tool might have some uses
On Sat, 2015-03-07 at 18:57 +0100, scl wrote:
With Peter's departure I don't really have a suggestion how to deal
with this kind of a situation. It's great that people contribute code,
and I'm thankful to them. But do we want to pile underdesigned
features up again? Personally, I
