I second that. Thanks to everyone who makes GIMP awesome.
No need to use Photoshop instead though, just be constructive.
If you see yourself as part of the community, you realise you're talking
with friends working for a common goal. This is the attitude that motivates
change to make GIMP better
> What falsehoods have I been spreading?
>
Because copy/pasting your own quotes to you from Reddit, which are still
there, is a good use of anyone's time.
Let's start with this: "by not setting dates to releases we
tell users to "f*** off"
Did you say that? Did you edit it away after the fact?
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 7:35 PM Niccolo Brogi wrote:
> Not so, I listened to what you said. Like I said many times, I change my
> mind like a flag in the middle of the storm, and you do have a positive
> attitude to not stop this natural process of mine.
>
> You ended your reply with "you were a
I said spreading falsehoods about GIMP was a "dick move", and it is.
I ended my last reply with "look in the mirror" as in, look how you're
treating people in the GIMP community. Is that how you want to be treated?
No? Then stop it. :)
___
I haven't a clue if the GIMP devs are paid for doing it or if it's just
something they do but, regardless, it's a fabulous piece of software
that merits thanks, not b1tching. If you don't like it, downgrade to
photoshop.
___
gimp-developer-list
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 6:25 PM Niccolo Brogi wrote:
> Nope.
>
> Everything started because I was called a "backseat viewer", and therefore
> not allowed to say that scheduled releases are good. After that I was
> replying to that attitude, and not about whether rolling releases are
> better
From a third party perspective, this is where things kicked off in the
thread:
"I didn't say you didn't include any features users ask for, I was just
justifying me complaining.
Why do you guys have to get so pissy so quickly, is it GIMP's code that
makes you that, or you have to pass a
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 4:48 PM Niccolo Brogi wrote:
> Regarding CCing people, my thread hasn't been approved, so I don't know if
> people can read it.
>
> Regarding the rest, you don't have to present exhibits, we're not in
> court. I'm giving you feedback about your behavior as someone who
>
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 3:46 PM Niccolo Brogi wrote:
> OK. If you're bad at talking to people (since people come with
> misconceptions although you could easily change that), as someone who
> doesn't only speak for himself, you should just not talk to people.
>
> It's also not just me, many
Hi Niccolo,
There is a certain thing I'm rather horrible at - trying to a have a
conversation with people who come with preconceptions about something they
are not qualified to make judgments of and unwilling to learn before
drawing conclusions.
When stumbling upon your message that by not
10 matches
Mail list logo
