Cubic seems to be giving much better results now. Thanks again Øyvind!
I no longer feel it necessary to always switch to NoHalo. Thankyou thankyou
thankyou!
Much respect,
-C
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Akkana Peck wrote:
> > > On 07/05/16 15:38, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
> > >> I've pushed code
> > On 07/05/16 15:38, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
> >> I've pushed code to GEGL master that makes the resamplers called
> >> "linear" and "cubic" do a tiny bit more than just interpolation.
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
> > The more you change the default behavior of existi
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
> I would ask you to reinstate the old code and have the new selectable
> under a new name - then at least an existing workflow could remain
> intact and the user would be made aware (a little bit at least) that
> there may be something bet
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Karl Günter Wünsch
wrote:
> On 07/05/16 15:38, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
>>
>> I've pushed code to GEGL master that makes the resamplers called
>> "linear" and "cubic" do a tiny bit more than just interpolation.
>
> The more you change the default behavior of existing fi
On 07/05/16 15:38, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
>
> I've pushed code to GEGL master that makes the resamplers called
> "linear" and "cubic" do a tiny bit more than just interpolation.
The more you change the default behavior of existing filters the more it
makes the use of GIMP impossible in a setup wher
Awesome! Thanks. :) It will be great to get a decent result from cubic
again.
-C
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:03 AM, C R wrote:
> > I assume the reasoning behind using cubic as the default for all the
> scale
> > and transform tools is to cut
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:03 AM, C R wrote:
> I assume the reasoning behind using cubic as the default for all the scale
> and transform tools is to cut back on the complaints of how slow GIMP is at
> the moment, but the quality loss in the current cubic interpolation
> algorithm is quite bad.
>
I suspect that it would make very little difference when downsampling, but
maybe sigmoidization, as used in LoHalo, is not worth the computational
cost.
Very easy to modify the code:
Remove the extended_sigmoidal and inverse_sigmoidal function definitions,
and then replace these strings (which tr
Are there plans to fix the cubic interpolation so it doesn't toss away
quite so much resolution?
It seems to me it didn't do that quite so much before.
-C
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Liam R. E. Quin wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 00:59 +0200, Nicolas Robidoux wrote:
> > Liam:
> >
> > Do
On Fri, 2016-04-29 at 00:59 +0200, Nicolas Robidoux wrote:
> Liam:
>
> Do you ever find LoHalo (snail crawling notwithstanding) worthwhile?
Yes, but because it's so slow I use it less than once a month.
It feels like it takes half an hour or so, but I suspect it's probably
more like 10 minutes.
Liam:
Do you ever find LoHalo (snail crawling notwithstanding) worthwhile?
Nicolas
___
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List arch
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:03 +0100, C R wrote:
> I assume the reasoning behind using cubic as the default for all the
> scale
> and transform tools is to cut back on the complaints of how slow GIMP
> is at
> the moment, but the quality loss in the current cubic interpolation
> algorithm is quite bad
Thanks Liam. I suppose this will work okay for my purpose. Thanks for the
tip.
-C
On 27 Apr 2016 6:09 pm, "Liam R. E. Quin" wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 09:03 +0100, C R wrote:
> > I assume the reasoning behind using cubic as the default for all the
> > scale
> > and transform tools is to cut
I assume the reasoning behind using cubic as the default for all the scale
and transform tools is to cut back on the complaints of how slow GIMP is at
the moment, but the quality loss in the current cubic interpolation
algorithm is quite bad.
Can we shift the default to No Halo or Lo Halo?
Also, i
14 matches
Mail list logo
