but Hi Kevin,
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Kevin Payne wrote:
>
>>From: Jehan Pagès
>>Sent: 21 February 2016 17:24
>>To: Kevin Payne
>>Cc: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Icon sizes requi
>From: Jehan Pagès
>Sent: 21 February 2016 17:24
>To: Kevin Payne
>Cc: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Icon sizes required
>Hi,
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Kevin Payne wrote:
> But that is partly my po
y means our default theme had been providing definitely
not-pixel-perfect all along.
Jehan
> --- Original Message ---
>
> From: "Michael Schumacher"
> Sent: 21 February 2016 10:39
> To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Icon sizes required
But that is partly my point - The original icons are apparently the wrong size,
so my question stands: How to determine what sizes are required?
--- Original Message ---
From: "Michael Schumacher"
Sent: 21 February 2016 10:39
To: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: [Gimp-devel
Am 21.02.2016 um 09:27 schrieb Kevin Payne:
> So my question is this: Is there a way to get a correct list of all
> the required icon sizes as the current reference, icon-list.mk file,
> is inaccurate?
IMO our next step should be to restore the previous colored icons and
work on the new ones as a
Continuing on from the discussion on IRC earlier this week about pixel-aligned
icons, I re-drew the gimp-gravity-* icons to align for the current 24x24 size.
However, when then trying them on 2.9.3.2cd687a I found that the icon-theme is
requesting size 20x20 and therefore the 24x24 are being re