Am 12.03.2012 10:05, schrieb Alexandre Prokoudine:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Anke Lange wrote:
hello list,
Hello Anke,
If you mail to the list, please mail to the list, not privately ;-)
Sorry about that, I didn't mean to and I'm not used to writing on
mailinglists :(
...
I neve
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Partha Bagchi wrote:
>
>> I build Windows versions and don't expect gimp.org to link to my site.
>
> Actually, I think we should. You've been around for long enough to be
> trusted. Even though I'd feel
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Anke Lange wrote:
> hello list,
Hello Anke,
If you mail to the list, please mail to the list, not privately ;-)
> I had a look at the linklist on gimp.org
>
> So I find it rather difficult to believe, that my website and community is
> not registered on gimp.org
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Partha Bagchi wrote:
> I build Windows versions and don't expect gimp.org to link to my site.
Actually, I think we should. You've been around for long enough to be
trusted. Even though I'd feel much more comfortable if we hosted all
unstable and experimental (rggj
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Partha Bagchi wrote:
> I would think this is the other way around? :) I would expect the user
> groups to keep a link to gimp.org? I build Windows versions and don't
> expect gimp.org to link to my site. Moreover, there are other sites
> such as Gimpchat.com (my fa
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:45 AM, SorinN wrote:
>> Maybe you could put a link to gimpusers.com on the front page.
>
> Why?
>
> - because it will not hurt
- Why does a dog lick his balls?
- Because he can.
Sorry, but I need a better reason.
> - because it's somewhat logic (why not keeping a link t
that's not mean that you are right.
please think from the user perspective
indeed you don't expect them to link to your builds
that's does not mean that they should not do that.
from a developer point of view they have some reasons for that - connected
with the credibility of the GIMP stable relea
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 5:45 PM, SorinN wrote:
>> Maybe you could put a link to gimpusers.com on the front page.
>
> Why?
>
> - because it will not hurt
> - because it's somewhat logic (why not keeping a link to a community of
> users ?)
>
I would think this is the other way around? :) I would exp
> Maybe you could put a link to gimpusers.com on the front page.
Why?
- because it will not hurt
- because it's somewhat logic (why not keeping a link to a community of
users ?)
2012/3/12 Alexandre Prokoudine
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:17 PM, grafxuser wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > currently I see
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:17 PM, grafxuser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently I see the gimp.org news page updated round about one time per
> month.
>
> Why not tell the readers more often about GIMP's progress? Look at
> digikam.org. Nearly every week there comes a message, showing what's
> possible with
Hi,
currently I see the gimp.org news page updated round about one time per
month.
Why not tell the readers more often about GIMP's progress? Look at
digikam.org. Nearly every week there comes a message, showing what's
possible with Digikam and that the project is still alive.
To show this
11 matches
Mail list logo
