Re: [Gimp-developer] Rethinking mailing list rules

2012-10-10 Thread Gfxuser
Liam R E Quin (l...@holoweb.net) wrote: Minor note, Write Readable should probably be Write Readably. Simon Budig wrote: Can we add a sentence about mailing list digests? Sometimes people just reply to the digest mails, yielding unreadable subjects and broken threads... Thank you, Liam and

Re: [Gimp-developer] Rethinking mailing list rules

2012-10-08 Thread Gfxuser
Hi, thank you all for your positive reactions and helpful comments. I reworked the whole list and made a short version with four easy to remember items and separate more detailed explanations out of it. You find it at http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php/Mindstorm:_Rework_of_mailing_list_rules. I

Re: [Gimp-developer] Rethinking mailing list rules

2012-10-08 Thread Paka
* Gfxuser gfx.u...@online.de [10-08-12 16:01]: ... I reworked the whole list and made a short version with four easy to remember items and separate more detailed explanations out of it. You find it at http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php/Mindstorm:_Rework_of_mailing_list_rules. I also linked to

Re: [Gimp-developer] Rethinking mailing list rules

2012-10-08 Thread Liam R E Quin
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:00 +0200, Gfxuser wrote: http://wiki.gimp.org/index.php/Mindstorm:_Rework_of_mailing_list_rules. Much better, thank you for your hard work! Minor note, Write Readable should probably be Write Readably. Liam -- Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C,

Re: [Gimp-developer] Rethinking mailing list rules

2012-09-23 Thread Paka
* Gfxuser gfx.u...@online.de [09-23-12 11:51]: because of some neverending discussions on the mailing lists in the last time schumaml and I considered rethinking the mailing list etiquette rules. Thereto I searched the web for existing mailing list rules and found quite a lot. Because I see