>
>
> Everything started because I was called a "backseat viewer", and therefore
> not allowed to say that scheduled releases are good. After that I was
> replying to that attitude, and not about whether rolling releases are
> better (which I had an extremely open mind about).
>
You said all
And again, nothing is learned. More name calling, and it's everyone else
that's the problem.
If anyone else wondering why the sarcasm all the time, look in the mirror.
lol
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 4:25 PM Niccolo Brogi wrote:
> Fair enough. I guess people (total of 3 different people) that
I already replied (I think you forgot to copy others), but here is that I
said:
> Let's start with this: "by not setting dates to releases we
tell users to "f*** off"
> Did you say that? Did you edit it away after the fact?
> Don't feign innocence, you're not convincing anyone.
I've already
Not so, I listened to what you said. Like I said many times, I change my
mind like a flag in the middle of the storm, and you do have a positive
attitude to not stop this natural process of mine.
You ended your reply with "you were a dick", I said that I have 3 more.
It's 4 or us so far, then.
Fine with me.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 5:43 PM Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 7:35 PM Niccolo Brogi wrote:
>
>> Not so, I listened to what you said. Like I said many times, I change my
>> mind like a flag in the middle of the storm, and
What falsehoods have I been spreading?
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 5:39 PM C R wrote:
> I said spreading falsehoods about GIMP was a "dick move", and it is.
> I ended my last reply with "look in the mirror" as in, look how you're
> treating people in the GIMP community. Is that how you want to be
Fair enough. I guess people (total of 3 different people) that PMed me are
dicks, too.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018, 16:59 C R wrote:
>
>> Everything started because I was called a "backseat viewer", and
>> therefore not allowed to say that scheduled releases are good. After that I
>> was replying to
Nope.
Everything started because I was called a "backseat viewer", and therefore
not allowed to say that scheduled releases are good. After that I was
replying to that attitude, and not about whether rolling releases are
better (which I had an extremely open mind about).
The message you quoted
> I will have to point out that name-calling, which you once again went
for, is not welcome on our mailing lists as per code of conduct
Ah, I see how you've been able to get away with it.
Fair enough.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018, 15:01 Alexandre Prokoudine <
alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Regarding CCing people, my thread hasn't been approved, so I don't know if
people can read it.
Regarding the rest, you don't have to present exhibits, we're not in court.
I'm giving you feedback about your behavior as someone who represents the
whole team (unless I got your pronuons wrong, you
OK. If you're bad at talking to people (since people come with
misconceptions although you could easily change that), as someone who
doesn't only speak for himself, you should just not talk to people.
It's also not just me, many people have the same problem with you. I guess
it's you against the
> What falsehoods have I been spreading?
>
Because copy/pasting your own quotes to you from Reddit, which are still
there, is a good use of anyone's time.
Let's start with this: "by not setting dates to releases we
tell users to "f*** off"
Did you say that? Did you edit it away after the fact?
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 7:35 PM Niccolo Brogi wrote:
> Not so, I listened to what you said. Like I said many times, I change my
> mind like a flag in the middle of the storm, and you do have a positive
> attitude to not stop this natural process of mine.
>
> You ended your reply with "you were a
I said spreading falsehoods about GIMP was a "dick move", and it is.
I ended my last reply with "look in the mirror" as in, look how you're
treating people in the GIMP community. Is that how you want to be treated?
No? Then stop it. :)
___
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 6:25 PM Niccolo Brogi wrote:
> Nope.
>
> Everything started because I was called a "backseat viewer", and therefore
> not allowed to say that scheduled releases are good. After that I was
> replying to that attitude, and not about whether rolling releases are
> better
From a third party perspective, this is where things kicked off in the
thread:
"I didn't say you didn't include any features users ask for, I was just
justifying me complaining.
Why do you guys have to get so pissy so quickly, is it GIMP's code that
makes you that, or you have to pass a
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 4:48 PM Niccolo Brogi wrote:
> Regarding CCing people, my thread hasn't been approved, so I don't know if
> people can read it.
>
> Regarding the rest, you don't have to present exhibits, we're not in
> court. I'm giving you feedback about your behavior as someone who
>
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 3:46 PM Niccolo Brogi wrote:
> OK. If you're bad at talking to people (since people come with
> misconceptions although you could easily change that), as someone who
> doesn't only speak for himself, you should just not talk to people.
>
> It's also not just me, many
Hi Niccolo,
There is a certain thing I'm rather horrible at - trying to a have a
conversation with people who come with preconceptions about something they
are not qualified to make judgments of and unwilling to learn before
drawing conclusions.
When stumbling upon your message that by not
19 matches
Mail list logo
