Hi
here are some thoughts from me to the topic and postings before:
1. Solve the real problems:
Full acknowledgement with Alexia and Alexandre to first solve the real
problems that caused the delay. I like the proposal for the further Git
branching and the proposal to iteratively check-in in
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:25 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
No amount of money will help if there is no one available with the skills,
level of knowledge of GIMP's source code, and the time to work on the
project. I think the people with enough knowledge of GIMP's internals and
the who have
On 03/09/2012 09:01 PM, Kevin Cozens wrote:
Someone wrote:
So what kind of money do you think would it take to catch up? Or to
at least make a significant step towards catching up?
No amount of money will help if there is no one available with the
skills, level of knowledge of GIMP's
Alexandre wrote:
Personally, what I really need is CMYK
Everyone wants CMYK, few mention what they need specifically :)
yeah, beware of the schmuck:
http://blog.mmiworks.net/2009/05/gimp-enter.html
--ps
founder + principal interaction architect
man + machine
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Jeremy Morton ad...@game-point.net wrote:
With all due respect, your method of not paying anyone has resulted in 2
years without a stable release of GIMP. What's your point? It's not like
things are just rosy and there aint nothing to fix.
Failure to release
2012/3/5 Chris Mohler cr33...@gmail.com
Early binding. Exporting to CMYK (for publishers who only accept CMYK
files). Rich black vs 100% K. Hard soft proof (for clients who
wish to print 0,0,255 and need to be shown the inevitable color
shift). Overprinting. I'm sure I could dig up a
But your point is true ..there are a lack of qualified manpower to
speed-up the development and a daily growing list of requests from the
userland.
So what kind of money do you think would it take to catch up? Or to
at least make a significant step towards catching up?
-paul
