On 06/01/2016 11:57 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Tobias Jakobs wrote:
>>>
>>> Even better would be to suport a piece of descriptive text included in
>>> the theme, but I'm not sure how it would get translated.
>>>
>> Even better
> > Even better would be to suport a piece of descriptive text included in
> > the theme, but I'm not sure how it would get translated.
> >
> Even better would be an example icon. Then we don't need to care about
> the wording that much.
>
> Regards
> Tobias
>
>
> Even better would be to suport a piece of descriptive text included in
> the theme, but I'm not sure how it would get translated.
>
Even better would be an example icon. Then we don't need to care about
the wording that much.
Regards
Tobias
___
On Tue, 2016-05-31 at 11:42 +0200, Jehan Pagès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Petteri Soininen
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Wouldn't that confusion be resolved by naming them as they are
> > meant to be
> > used:
> > Symbolic-for-dark and Symbolic-for-light?
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Tobias Jakobs wrote:
>>
>> Even better would be to suport a piece of descriptive text included in
>> the theme, but I'm not sure how it would get translated.
>>
> Even better would be an example icon. Then we don't need to care
On 16-06-01 02:47 AM, Liam R. E. Quin wrote:
I am not sure it's such a big deal. We could call the dark one Darth
and the light one Luke, and people would just click on them and try
them and it'd be enough.
The names are of no importance to me. I use the click and try approach to
check out