On 01/23/2017 06:58 AM, Laxminarayan Kamath wrote:
Hi all!
While you guys are at it, I encourage you to try out this formula:
E = (2 * I ) - M
Note that the recent work in master removed the channel-value clamping
that used to happen during blending (yay! :), and since each layer
appears
On 1/23/17, Øyvind Kolås wrote:
> This is similar to something else I have experimented with, permitting
> opacity values below 0% and above 100% for normal mode, this permits
> implementing unsharp mask with a blur layer - as well as increasing
> saturation by blending a color
On second reading, the previous description is not that clear on how
to use it. (unless you have read the unsharp mask script)
You have an image with a slight radial or zoom blur or motion blur
(the photographer tried to be creative) .
You duplicate the layer.
You measure and run the same exact
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Laxminarayan Kamath
wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> While you guys are at it, I encourage you to try out this formula:
>
> E = (2 * I ) - M
>
> I call it the "Opposite" mode. I derived it from how the unsharp mask
> does the sharpening - first run a
Hi all!
While you guys are at it, I encourage you to try out this formula:
E = (2 * I ) - M
I call it the "Opposite" mode. I derived it from how the unsharp mask
does the sharpening - first run a grain extract and then do a grain
merge.
It is not useful in an awful lot of places. But when you