Re: [Gimp-developer] Tuning and choosing resampling methods in GEGL/GIMP

On 10/23/2017 10:03 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote: This is what an adaptively increasing the OFFSET0 constant for significant downscaling in the sources might achieve - do note that what is meant by significant downscaling here is when scaling down to below 1% of original size - even in such scenarios

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tuning and choosing resampling methods in GEGL/GIMP

On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Elle Stone wrote: > Agreeing with what you say, I've tried lohalo and never saw any reason to > use it instead of nohalo. For several years now nohalo is the only > downsizing method that I use. > > I see in the git log that some

Re: [Gimp-developer] Tuning and choosing resampling methods in GEGL/GIMP

On 10/23/2017 09:13 AM, Øyvind Kolås wrote: The actual reason for this email is that I think it might be overkill to have both lohalo and nohalo available as choices, they are related and powerful transformation ellipsis aware methods, maybe it is sufficient to have one go-to high quality

[Gimp-developer] Tuning and choosing resampling methods in GEGL/GIMP

Evaluating many mildly diverging images is part of image development, but as much as possible should not need to be part of the workflow for operators of software like GIMP. Providing many toggles, options and references is a way to botch complicate the user interface visually as well burden the