Re: [Gimp-developer] Problems using the PF_STRINGARRAY parameter type when writing a Python plugin for Gimp.

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Craig Sanders wrote: > Hello. > > I'm trying to write a very basic plugin for Gimp using Python and I > want its one and only parameter to be of type PF_STRINGARRAY. The goal > of my plugin for the time being, is to receive a list

[Gimp-developer] Problems using the PF_STRINGARRAY parameter type when writing a Python plugin for Gimp.

Hello. I'm trying to write a very basic plugin for Gimp using Python and I want its one and only parameter to be of type PF_STRINGARRAY. The goal of my plugin for the time being, is to receive a list of files, and then simply print their names on the Command line, when the plugin is run. The

[Gimp-developer] Git and Bugzilla migration to gitlab.gnome.org - action items and important hints

Hi all, GNOME is migrating all projects to https://gitlab.gnome.org This GitLab instance is replacing both the current GNOME Git repository and GNOME Bugzilla. On 2018-05-23 (tomorrow/today, depending on time zone), GIMP and its bugs will be migrated. This has some effects and requires some

[Gimp-developer] Lost key settings in Gimp 2.10

Lost key settings in Gimp 2.10 I downloaded Gimp 2.10 and it all worked fine, added GMIC as plugin, all worked fine. Then I tried to install darktable as plugin, but it didn't work. Don't know if it's possible in windows. I did it manually, copied files to the plugin directory. When it didn't

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP branched: new stable branch gimp-2-10

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 5:33 PM, Elle Stone wrote: > On 05/22/2018 11:09 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote: > >> Gtk4 doesn't have a Mac backend AFAIK and I'm not sure it's widely tested >>> >> on Windows >> > > Hmm, this page seems to indicate GTK+4 does/will have support

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP branched: new stable branch gimp-2-10

On 05/22/2018 11:09 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote: Gtk4 doesn't have a Mac backend AFAIK and I'm not sure it's widely tested on Windows Hmm, this page seems to indicate GTK+4 does/will have support for MacOs: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=GTK-3.91-Released quoting: "GTK+ 3.91

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP branched: new stable branch gimp-2-10

Hi! On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 5:00 PM, Kristian Rietveld wrote: > > > On 22 May 2018, at 16:01, Jehan Pagès > wrote: > > > > There is another issue which was raised these days by GTK+ developers who > > discussed GIMP port: apparently GTK+3.99 (to

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP branched: new stable branch gimp-2-10

> On 22 May 2018, at 16:01, Jehan Pagès wrote: > > There is another issue which was raised these days by GTK+ developers who > discussed GIMP port: apparently GTK+3.99 (to become GTK+4) has currently no > macOS backend! Basically that means we'd lose GIMP on macOS.

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP branched: new stable branch gimp-2-10

Hi! On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Simon Budig wrote: > Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote: > > On 05/21/2018 11:13 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote: > > > Just to be clear, the toolkit update here is not*just* a necessary > evil. > > > It will also be totally awesome,

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP branched: new stable branch gimp-2-10

Elle Stone (ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com) wrote: > On 05/21/2018 11:13 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote: > > Just to be clear, the toolkit update here is not*just* a necessary evil. > > It will also be totally awesome, even feature-wise! > > > > > Simply to get there, we have to pass through an

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP branched: new stable branch gimp-2-10

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 2:04 PM, Elle Stone wrote: > Will the port to GTK+3 be finished before the apparently planned initial > release of GTK+4 later this year > (https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2018/02/03/gtk-hackfests-day-2/)? How can one possibly provide a realistic estimation of that? :)

Re: [Gimp-developer] GIMP branched: new stable branch gimp-2-10

On 05/21/2018 11:13 AM, Jehan Pagès wrote: Just to be clear, the toolkit update here is not*just* a necessary evil. It will also be totally awesome, even feature-wise! Simply to get there, we have to pass through an "unstable" phase, that's all there is to it. Hi All, Apparently